Showing posts with label QUESTION ANSWER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label QUESTION ANSWER. Show all posts

November 28, 2022

Class 11 Political Science NCERT QUESTION ANSWER OF Chapter 1 - Political Theory: An Introduction Prepared by Suman Kumar Jha

 Chapter 1 - Political Theory: An Introduction

Question 1:

Which of the following statements are true/false about Political theory?

(a) It discusses ideas that form the basis of political institutions.

(b) It explains the relationship between different religions.

(c) It explains the meanings of concepts like equality and freedom.

(d) It predicts the performance of political parties.

Answer:

(a) True

(b) False

(c) True

(d) False

Question 2:

Politics is more than what politicians do. Do you agree with this statement? Give examples.

Answer:

It is correct that politics is more than what politicians do. Politicians as a part of government are involved in politics but politics is not limited to their activities. Politics involves number of various negotiations that go on in society through which collective decisions are made.

Politics involves the actions of government and its relation to the aspirations of the people.

Politics involves the struggle of people and its influence on decision making.

People are engaged in political activity whenever they negotiate with each other and participate in collective activities that are designed to promote social development and resolve common problems.

  For example, residents of localities form associations to solve their common problems and raise these issues at higher level.

  Students form unions in colleges and universities to debate and resolve issues that affect the majority of them.

  Thus, politics is involved in the sphere of life that is related to power, collective decision-making and solving common problems.

Question 3:

Vigilant citizens are a must for the successful working of a democracy. Comment.

Answer:

  Vigilant people are a must for the successful working of a democracy as vigilance creates awareness about the rights of citizens and government policies that affect daily life.

  Awareness leads to discussion and debate on the issues that arise out of the implementation of policies.

  Citizens can, thus, force the government to implement new policies or modify the existing policies and programmes of the country by building up and mobilising their opinion.

  As democracy is about government of the citizens, by the citizens and for the citizens, vigilance of the citizens accelerates the successful working of a democracy.

Question 4:

In what ways is the study of political theory useful for us? Identify four ways in which the political theory can be useful to us.

Answer:

Political theory is useful for us as it helps in understanding the meaning of political concepts by looking at the way they are understood and used in ordinary language.

Political theories debate and examine the various meanings and opinions from different contexts in a systematic manner.

The four ways in which the political theory can be useful to us, are:

  It helps in understanding how constitutions are shaped in a certain manner, how governments and social lives are arranged in a certain systematic manner by studying and understanding the ideas and principles that are at their base.

  It shows the significance of various principles such as rule of law, separation of power, judicial review etc.

  Political theory helps bureaucrats, politicians, government officers and advocates to interpret the laws and constitution. It also helps in understanding the problems of society and explore the ways to solve them.

  Political theory encourages individuals to examine their ideas and feelings about political things so that they can become moderate in their ideas and feelings.

Question 5:

Do you think that a good/ convincing argument can compel others to listen to you?

Answer:

Yes, a good/ convincing argument can compel others to listen to one. Arguments prove the degree of reason of a proposition and the need to defend it. A good defence is a compelling factor in the audience listening to the speaker. The knowledge of political theory enables the individual to think systematically on issues like justice and freedom and polish his/her opinion. This helps the presentation of argument in an informed manner. A wise opinion is convincing and is for the sake of common interests. Therefore, it makes others listen to and agree with the individual who argues in a convincing manner.

Question 6:

Do you think studying political theory is like studying mathematics? Give reasons for your answer.

Answer:

Studying political theory is not like studying mathematics as mathematics deals with precise concepts and patterns while political theory studies human beings and their ideas in the context of power and decision-making. In mathematics, there are single definitions of terms. In political theory, on the other hand, the definitions of terms vary according to the context. This is because the opinion of people changes unlike objects and carries different meanings of a single term in different contexts. The concepts that are dealt by mathematics are constant and derived through formulae whereas the concepts of political theory are at variance and open to interpretation.


Class 11 Political Science NCERT QUESTION ANSWER OF Chapter 2 - Freedom Prepared by Suman Kumar Jha

 Chapter 2 - Freedom

Question 1:

What is meant by freedom? Is there a relationship between freedom for the individual and freedom for

the nation?

Answer:

Freedom is a situation that limits the constraints on individuals and allows them to expand their

ability and reach their potential.

Freedom allows the full development of an individual’s creativity, sensibility, capabilities and the

autonomy to make choices.

It permits the individuals to exercise their power of reason and judgement.

Yes, there is a relationship between freedom for the individual and freedom for the nation.

A free nation allows the full development of individual’s talent and ability by making fewer

constraints on individuals.

An individual is said to be free only if s/he resides in a free nation.

A nation is said to be free if it has freedom as one of its principles and only if it has provided this to

its people. In this way, individual freedom and national freedom are closely linked together.

Question 2:

What is the difference between the negative and positive conception of liberty?

Answer:

Negative liberty Positive liberty

1. It defines and defends the area of

an individual’s life where no

external authority can interfere.

i. It defines the area of society where an

individual can be free with some constraints

made by the society and the government.

2. It is not concerned with the

conditions of the society.

ii. It is concerned with the enabling conditions

of the society.

3. It is concerned with explaining the

idea of ‘freedom from’.

iii. It is concerned with explaining the idea of

‘freedom to’.

4. This area comes into personal

domain of the individual.

iv. This area comes into social domain of the

individual.

5. More negative liberty leads to more

freedom.

v. More positive liberty checks excess of

freedom to an individual, which could be an obstruction for social stability.

Question 3:

What is meant by social constraints? Are constraints of any kind necessary for enjoying freedom?

Answer:

Social constraints are the external controls on individual freedom maintained by the society.

The government, as a part of the society, controls individual freedom through laws that embodies

the power of the government and are legitimatised.

Constraints on freedom are also a result of social inequality.

Yes, constraints are essential to enjoy freedom.

Constraints are necessary to develop respect for views and beliefs of others.

It is necessary for the creation of a society.

Absence of constraint would lead to imposition of beliefs and ideas of stronger groups eventually

leading to conflict.

Constraints are required to control violence and settle disputes.

Question 4:

What is the role of the state in upholding freedom of its citizens?

Answer:

The state upholds the freedom of its citizens by providing certain rights to them.

The state maintains ‘justifiable constraints’ or reasonable restrictions on people so that they cannot

harm others and their freedom.

It provides positive liberty to its citizens to enable them to expand their ability and talent.

It defines and checks ‘other regarding’ actions of its people in order to maintain social stability.

Question 5:

What is meant by freedom of expression? What in your view would be a reasonable restriction on this

freedom? Give examples.

Answer:

Freedom of expression means the freedom to express one’s views through speech, writing etc. 

It is considered to belong to the minimum area of ‘non-interference’, that is, negative liberty.

According to the provisions of the Indian Constitution, this is a fundamental right.

Society bears some inconvenience caused by freedom of speech to protect it from people who

want to restrict it.

Society cannot restrict people from expressing themselves freely whether it agrees with their views

or not.

A reasonable restriction of freedom of expression is one that allows society to function smoothly

and curbs interference in privacy.

These restrictions are reasonable as they are necessary to run the society smoothly.

Following are some reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech cannot interfere in someone’s privacy. Employees of Royal household of

England are constrained by contract from disclosing any inner affairs of the royal household.

Another example of putting restriction on freedom of speech is of film censor board. Censor board


Class 11 Political Science NCERT QUESTION ANSWER OF Chapter 3 - Equality Prepared by Suman Kumar Jha

Chapter 3 - Equality
Question 1:
Some people argue that inequality is natural while others maintain that it is equality which is natural and the inequalities which we notice around us are created by society. Which view do you support?
Give reasons.
Answer:
Any answer supported with argument or explanation would solve the purpose. It is strongly recommended that you prepare the solution on your own. However, a sample solution has been provided for your reference:
Equality is natural and the inequalities which we notice around us are created by society.
People are naturally equal because of the common humanity.
Inequality exists because of unequal opportunities and exploitation of one group from other groups in the society.
  Natural inequalities are those that emerge between people as a result of their different capabilities and talents.
  Social circumstances, situations and conditions help the individual to grow and develop her/his talents and capabilities.
  Different status and roles are essential for smooth running of the society but these status and roles are decided by the society that shows inequality.
Society categorises the people on the basis of race, gender, caste, class etc that create inequality.
Thus, society labels certain race, gender, caste, class to be treated inferior or superior by creating stereotypes.
Question 2:
There is a view that absolute economic equality is neither possible nor desirable. It is argued that the most a society can do is to try and reduce the gaps between the richest and poorest members of society. Do you agree?
Answer:
Any answer supported with argument or explanation would solve the purpose. It is strongly recommended that you prepare the solution on your own. However, a sample solution has been provided for your reference:
  It is correct that absolute economic equality is not possible even though it is desirable. The most a society can do is to try and reduce the gaps between the richest and poorest members of society to bring economic equality.
  Society has different status, roles and ranks for its members so that it can function smoothly.
  People achieve different ranks according to their capabilities and the rewards are equivalent to the work and responsibilities that are attached to their rank.
  Therefore, absolute economic equality cannot be possible as inequality in income will remain in the society.
  The gap between the richest and poorest members of the society can be reduced by providing equality in opportunity to everyone, regardless of their background.
Question 3:
Match the following concepts with appropriate instances:
(a) Affirmative action (i) Every adult citizen has a right to vote
(b) Equality of opportunity (ii) Banks offer higher rate of interest to senior citizen (c) Equal Rights (iii) Every child should get free education
Answer:
(a) Affirmative action (ii) Banks offer higher rate of interest to senior citizen
(b) Equality of opportunity (iii) Every child should get free education(c) Equal Rights. (i) Every adult citizen has a right to vote
Question 4:
A government report on farmers’ problems says that small and marginal farmers cannot get good prices from the market. It recommends that the government should intervene to ensure a better price but only for small and marginal farmers. Is this recommendation consistent with the principle of equality?
Answer:
The recommendation of the government is consistent with the principle of equality as the intervention is necessary to secure the interests of small and marginal farmers.
Small and marginal farmers do not have access to adequate resources to sustain themselves during the off-season. Therefore, they need better compensation for their produce.
Question 5:
Which of the following violate the principles of equality and why?
(a) Every child in class will read the text of the play by turn.
(b) The Government of Canada encouraged white Europeans to migrate to Canada from the end ofthe Second World War till 1960.
(c) There is a separate railway reservation counter for the senior citizens.
(d) Access to some forest areas is reserved for certain tribal communities.
Answer:
(a) It is not a violation of principles of equality as reading by turn is necessary to maintain disciplineand coherence in class.
(b) It is a violation of principles of equality as white Europeans were given preference and privilegeover coloured people on the basis of their colour differences.
(c) It is not a violation of principles of equality because this right is given to the senior citizens on thebasis of their special needs and requirements.
(d) It is not a violation of principles of equality because it protects the livelihood rights and culture ofthe tribal people.
Question 6:
Here are some arguments in favour of the right to vote for women.
Which of these are consistent with the idea of equality? Give reasons.
(a) Women are our mothers. We shall not disrespect our mothers by denying them the right to vote.
(b) Decisions of the government affect women as well as men, therefore they also should have a sayin choosing the rulers.
(c) Not granting women the right to vote will cause disharmony in the family.
(d) Women constitute half of humanity. You cannot subjugate them for long by denying them the rightto vote.
Answer:
(a) It is not consistent with the idea of equality as this is not based on the principles of equality but thisargument emanates from our emotions.
(b) It is consistent with the idea of equality as this argument is based on the impact of decision makingprocess on women and hence, their right to choose the decision makers.
(c) It is not consistent with the idea of equality as it is concerned more with the disintegration of familyrather than giving women equal opportunity to choose their representatives.
(d) It is consistent with the idea of equality as this argument is based on rational thinking. Women areconsidered as equal to men in the composition of society and are therefore given equal importance and opportunity to cast their vote.

Class 11 Political Science NCERT QUESTION ANSWER OF Chapter 4 - Social Justice PREPARED BY SUMAN KUMAR JHA

Chapter 4 - Social Justice
Question 1:
What does it mean to give each person his/her due? How has the meaning of “giving each his due” changed over time?
Answer:
Giving each person his/her due means providing justice by ensuring the well-being of all the people.
In contemporary time, the concept of “giving each his due” has changed to the understanding of what is due to each person as a human being.
The German philosopher Immanuel Kant argued that if all persons are granted dignity then what is due to each of them is the opportunity to develop their talents and pursue their chosen goals.
Question 2:
Briefly discuss the three principles of justice outlined in the chapter. Explain each with examples.
Answer:
Equal Treatment of Equals:
This indicates the principle of treating people equally.
All individuals share certain characteristics as human beings. Therefore, they deserve to be treated equally and provided with equal rights.
  It includes civil rights like right to life, liberty and property, political rights like right to vote and social rights related to equal social opportunities.
It also prohibits discrimination on the grounds of class, caste, gender and race.
For example, two individuals from different backgrounds should be paid same reward for the same kind of job.
Proportionate justice:
This principle indicates rewarding people in proportion to the scale and quality of their effort.
It is just to reward different jobs differently on the basis of efforts and skills required and the danger involved.
Thus, proportionality provides balance to the principle of equal treatment.
The reward and compensation for a surgeon and an architect varies according to the skill that is required in their job.
Recognition of Special Needs:
  This principle is based on distributing rewards and duties on the basis of special needs of people.
  On the basis of factors such as age, physical disabilities and lack of access to good education or health care, special treatment is given in many countries.
  People with special needs or disabilities are treated unequal in some particular respect and therefore are provided with some deserving and special help.
  A physically challenged person getting a reserved seat in bus is an example of principle of recognition of special needs.
Question 3:
Does the principle of considering the special needs of people conflict with the principle of equal treatment for all?
Answer:
  The principle of considering the special needs of people does not raise a conflict with the principle of equal treatment for all.
  People with special needs are given special treatment to facilitate their participation in the running of the society.
  People with special needs also require special treatment for integration with society and for securing opportunities and basic needs that would be otherwise denied to them.
  The senior citizens, women and socially backward people are given special treatment due to their special needs.
Question 4:
How does Rawls use the idea of a veil of ignorance to argue that fair and just distribution can be defended on rational grounds?
Answer:
  Rawls uses the idea of a veil of ignorance to argue that fair and just distribution can be defended on rational grounds.
  He says that if a person keeps herself/himself under the ‘veil of ignorance’ then s/he would come up with the just distribution, fair laws and policies that would affect the whole society.
  A person under the ‘veil of ignorance’ is unaware of her/his possible position and status in the society therefore s/he would rationally decide from the point of view of the worst-off.
  It would be sensible in this situation for everyone to ensure that all resources are available equally to all persons.
  In this way Rawls, with his idea of ‘veil of ignorance’, is able to prove that fair and just distribution can be defended on rational grounds with the help of this idea.
Question 5:
What are generally considered to be the basic minimum requirements of people for living a healthy and productive life? What is the responsibility of governments in trying to ensure this minimum to all?
Answer:
Housing, supply of clean water, basic amount of nourishment to remain healthy, education and minimum wage are the basic minimum requirements of people for living a healthy and productive life.
Government is responsible for providing these services to all sections of the society irrespective of their class, caste, race and gender at a cost they can afford.
  Supporters of free market ideology are in favour of providing goods and services by the private agencies and the state or government should only try to empower people to buy those goods and services. However, eventually, free market tends to work in the interest of the powerful section.
  Government checks the interference of private agencies in some sectors of the economy so that the goods and services in the free market do not become out of reach for the weaker sections.
Question 6:
Which of the following arguments could be used to justify state action to provide basic minimum conditions of life to all citizens?
(a) Providing free services to the poor and needy can be justified as an act of charity.
(b) Providing all citizens with a basic minimum standard of living is one way of ensuring equality ofopportunity.
(c) Some people are naturally lazy and we should be kind to them.
(d) Ensuring basic facilities and a minimum standard of living to all is a recognition of our sharedhumanity and a human right.
Answer:
(a) Providing free services to the poor and needy as an act of charity is unjustified basis of stateaction to provide basic minimum conditions of life to all citizens. Services to the poor and needy are their rights and the government should not give these to them as charity.
(b) Providing all citizens with a basic minimum standard of living to ensure equality of opportunity isjustified basis of state action to provide basic minimum conditions of life to all citizens. This is because it is the responsibility of the government to provide opportunities for citizens.
(c) Being kind to people who are lazy is not rational thinking as laziness is not a physical handicap.Therefore, it is an unjustified basis for state action to provide basic minimum conditions of life to all citizens.
(d) Ensuring basic facilities and a minimum standard of living to all as a recognition of our sharedhumanity and human rights is a justified basis of state action to provide basic minimum conditions of life to all citizens.

Class 11 Political Science NCERT QUESTION ANSWER OF Chapter 5 - Rights PREPARED BY SUMAN KUMAR JHA

Class 11 Political Science Chapter 5 - Rights
Question 1:
What are rights and why are they important? What are the bases on which claims to rights can be made?
Answer:
  Rights are primarily those state-recognised claims that every individual regards to be necessary for leading a life of respect and dignity. These are essentially a justified claim or an entitlement.
  Rights are important as they help individuals to develop their capacity to reason, develop their skills and enable them to make informed choices in life.
The bases on which claims to rights can be made are:
  The representation of conditions that individuals collectively see as a source of self-respect and dignity.
  The necessity for every individual’s well being.
Question 2:
On what grounds are some rights considered to be universal in nature? Identify three rights which you consider universal. Give reasons.
Answer:
The importance of certain rights for all human beings regardless of their place in society confers universality on these rights. The assumption behind human rights is the entitlement of human beings to certain rights that ensure self-respect and dignity by virtue of being born as humans. Thus, universal rights are those rights whose entitlement is non-negotiable.
The three universal rights are as follows:
  Right to education is considered to be universal in nature because this is must for an individual to develop his/her capacity to reason, skills and enables him/her to make informed choices in life. This helps the individual to make good use of other rights.
  Right to livelihood ensures self-respect and dignity of the individuals through economic independence.
  Freedom of expression is important for all human beings as it develops creativity and originality and allows for free expression of ideas and beliefs.
Question 3:
Discuss briefly some of the new rights claims which are being put forward in our country today—for example the rights of tribal people to protect their habitat and way of life, or the rights of children against bonded labour.
Answer:
  The claim of rights of tribal people to protect their habitat and way of life has emerged with the new conception of a secure and respectful life of individuals along with preserving their traditional way of life and access to resources.
  This is a result of change in society and its beliefs and providing special provisions or rights to people to protect indigenous culture.
Tribal people are given rights to own a part of land of the forest to which they belong.
They are given special facilities in education, job, medicine etc. so that they can compete with the rest of the society on equal terms.
  The rights of children against bonded labour are necessary to prevent their exploitation and ensure a safe childhood for them.
The right to education is a new right given in the Indian Constitution.
This right helps in preventing the violation of the basic right of children to education.
Right to information is a new right that helps the citizens to know the status or the procedure of the services that they are entitled to receive.
Question 4:
Differentiate between political, economic and cultural rights. Give examples of each kind of right.
Answer:
  Political rights are those rights that ensure equality before law and the right to participate in the political process. Right to contest election is a political right.
Economic rights are those rights that ensure the entitlement of basic needs of food, shelter etc.
Economic rights helps in fulfilling the political rights. Right to minimum wage is an economic right.
Cultural rights are given to citizens to preserve their culture, its essence and its dignity.
Political rights and economic rights help in ensuring cultural rights for citizens. Right to establish institutions to preserve one’s language is a cultural right.
Question 5:
Rights place some limits on the authority of the state. Explain with examples.
Answer:
  Rights place some limits on the authority of the state as they make the state responsible for its actions.
Rights place an obligation upon the state to act in a certain way.
For example, the state must ensure that its policies should provide basic needs to all its individuals.
Rights suggest what the state must refrain from doing.
The state cannot make laws that violate the fundamental rights of the citizens and go against the constitution.
  Freedom of expression is a basic right of individual therefore the state cannot stop anyone from expressing himself/herself.
  The state cannot arrest any individual unnecessarily as that would mean violating her/his right of liberty.

Class 11 Political Science NCERT QUESTION ANSWER Chapter 6 - Citizenship PREPARED BY SUMAN KUMAR JHA

Class 11 Political Science 
Chapter 6 - Citizenship
Question 1:
Citizenship as full and equal membership of a political community involves both rights and obligations. Which rights could citizens expect to enjoy in most democratic state today? What kind of obligation will they have to their state and fellow citizens?
Answer:
The rights that citizens are expected to enjoy most in democratic state are right to equality, right to vote in political elections, freedom of expression, right to have basic facilities, right to security and equal treatment by laws.
There are legal and moral obligations on citizens to participate in and contribute to the shared life of the community as well as the state. Citizens are also expected to preserve the culture and natural resources of their country.
Question 2:
All citizens may be granted equal rights but all may not be able to equally exercise them. Explain.
Answer:
All citizens may be granted equal rights but all may not be able to equally exercise them due to following factors:
Socio-economic inequality that prevents equality of opportunity
Lack of accessibility to legal remedies
Lack of awareness of rights
Corruption in the government apparatus that prevents the delivery of services covered under these rights.
The consequences of these factors can be seen in the following examples:
  Every child has right to education but some children are not sent to school due to gender bias and poverty and therefore are engaged in child labour.
  Many women are not aware that physical and mental torture by their husband comes under domestic violence. Therefore, they are not able to seek legal remedies.
Question 3:
Write a short note on any two struggles for full enjoyment of citizen rights which have taken place in India in recent years. Which rights were being claimed in each case?
Answer:
The movement in India regarding the rights of lesbians and gays to express and lead a normal life demanded the decriminalisation of homosexuality by the state that was considered to be a crime. Delhi high court has decriminalised homosexuality but still the movement is on as it has not yet gained the legal approval.
Narmada Bachao Andolan is an environmental as well as human rights movement. The movement is against increasing the height of the dam. The increase in the height of the dam will flood the area and residents will get displaced. The movement is to force the government to decrease the height of the dam and pay proper compensation to the people and assure rehabilitation for them.
Both the above mentioned movements are still going on for the human rights of people. The first movement was for freedom of expression, right to security and normal life as Indian citizens. The second movement focused on the right to shelter, food, employment and security of the people as citizens of India.
Question 4:
What are some of the problems faced by refugees? In what ways could the concept of global citizenship benefit them?
Answer:
Any answer supported with argument or explanation would solve the purpose. It is strongly recommended that you prepare the solution on your own. However, some sample pointers have been provided for your reference:
The following are some of the problems faced by refugees:
Refugees are not treated well by the local residents of the place.
They are considered as a burden on the local economy.
The local residents feel that refugees are snatching their job opportunities in that area.
The refugees are held responsible for spreading diseases, crime and polluting the area as they mostly live in slums and tents.
They are constrained to do useful and necessary work but at low wages.
Refugees face the problem of shelter, food and lack of employment.
Refugees are exempted from the rights that are given by the state to its people like enjoying the right of minimum standard of living and security.
  Thus, they are often exploited by the police and other local residents on grounds of the rights that they lack as a member of that state.
Global citizenship would be beneficial to refugees as it will be easier to deal with problems that extend across national boundaries and require cooperation of other states.
It would also help refugees and stateless people by providing them basic rights and solutions to their problems so that they can lead a normal life.
Question 5:
Migration of people to different regions within the country is often resisted by the local inhabitants.
What are some of the contributions that the migrants could make to the local economy?
Answer:
Migrants contribute greatly towards the economy of the state where they are working.
They perform useful work at lower wages and make up a large proportion of the service sector.
The goods and services provided by them are counted in the GDP.
Migrants bring new skills and techniques that can be adapted to suit local conditions.
Migrant workers also pay taxes and thus contribute to economic growth of their host region.
Question 6:
“Democratic citizenship is a project rather than an accomplished fact even in countries like India which grant equal citizenship”. Discuss some of the issues regarding citizenship being raised in India today.
Answer:
“Democratic citizenship is a project rather than an accomplished fact even in countries like India” as in democratic countries people are still far behind in fully enjoying the rights associated with democratic citizenship.
In the context of India, equality of rights is ensured for all citizens by the Constitution, but does not always translate on the ground.
Socio-economic inequality is a major factor preventing the access of all citizens to basic rights.
Citizens have the right to move and work freely anywhere within the territory, they have the right to enjoy basic facilities that are needed to survive and lead a healthy life but migrants are exempted from these rights as Indian citizens at some places.
  Besides migrants other citizens are not able to enjoy the rights fully. Girl children are not able to enjoy the basic right of education. Many poor children are forcefully engaged in child labour though these children have got certain fundamental rights in democratic India but they are not able to enjoy it.
  The issue of dual citizenship for people who reside outside the country is also a matter of debate and shows the dynamic nature of the concept of citizenship.
Therefore, it can be said that democratic citizenship is a project that has still to meet its goal rather than having accomplished it.

Class 11 Political Science NCERT QUESTION ANSWER Chapter 7 - Nationalism PREPARED BY SUMAN KUMAR JHA

Chapter 7 - Nationalism
Question 1:
How is a nation different from other forms of collective belonging?
Answer:
Nation is, to a great extent, an ‘imagined community’ held together by the collective beliefs, aspirations and imaginations of its members. It is based on certain assumptions like shared beliefs, common history, common territory, shared political ideals and common political identity that people construct about the collective whole with which they identify themselves. Unlike family its members are not linked with face-to-face relation. It is different from clans and other kinship groups as it is not based common descent. It is different from any lingual group as it is not based on a common language nor is it like a religious group as it does not share any common religion.
Question 2:
What do you understand by the right to national self-determination?
How has this idea resulted in both formation of and challenges to nation-states?
Answer:
Right to national self-determination means seeking the right by cultural groups to govern themselves and determine their future development as a nation.
The idea of national self-determination led to the formation of nation-state. As in case of Europe after First World-War, the countries were formed on the basis of culture they shared. It helped these groups to determine their future development path and to govern themselves.
This idea is also a challenge to the formation of nation-state as it is impossible to have one culture in a nation-state. It is impossible to ensure that each cultural group could achieve political independence and statehood. Examples for the same could be the mass migrations that took place after the reorganisation of state boundaries in Europe to maintain cultural homogeneity.
Question 3:
“We have seen that nationalism can unite people as well as divide them, liberate them as well generate bitterness and conflict”. Illustrate your answer with examples.
Neither descent, nor language, nor religion or ethnicity can claim to be a common factor in nationalisms all over the world. Comment.
Answer:
  Nationalism unites people into a bond on the basis of same territory, shared beliefs, common history, shared political ideals, common political identity and aspirations.
  The idea of nationalism can liberate people from the bond of various smaller groups to a wider and common group of nation where they share common interests and goals.
  It can also divide the people as every lingual or cultural group could demand for a separate nationstate.
  It can generate bitterness and conflict as demands for separate nation state by smaller groups often leads to conflict. Such situations are at the root of many ongoing conflicts in the world.
  Neither descent, nor language, nor religion or ethnicity can claim to be a common factor in nationalisms all over the world as there is no common set of characteristics that is present in every nation. It is very difficult for every lingual, religious and ethnic group to become politically and economically viable. This also leads to several problems for those groups that are in minority.
Therefore, no nation-state can stand only on the factor of religion or ethnicity.
Question 4:
Illustrate with suitable examples the factors that lead to the emergence of nationalist feelings.
Answer:
The factors that lead to the emergence of nationalist feelings are:
Shared beliefs − This refers to the collective identity and vision for the future of a group that aspires to have an independent political existence.
The citizens of a nation-state share common beliefs irrespective of ethnic or religious differences.
For example, every citizen of India wants the national hockey team to become world champion.
Common history − The citizens of a nation-state share a common history.
It perceives them as stretching back into the past as well as reaching into the future.
For example, Indians share a common history of nationalist movement and have the same vision for their future.
Common territory − It shares a common land or territory on which the people have been living for a long period of time. Thus, territory is an important component of unity.
For example, Indians identify themselves with the distinctive geographical features of the Indian subcontinent.
Shared political ideals − Citizens of a nation-state share a vision of the kind of state they want to build.
  They share same political ideas, they share commitment to a set of political ideas and are bound by a set of obligations legitimatised by the law of the state.
  For example, the Constitution of India that is representative of the collective will of the people has adopted democracy and secularism, among other ideals, as its goals.
Common political identity − The citizens share a common political identity irrespective of their religious, linguistic groups.
For example, a Sikh from Punjab, a Muslim from Uttar Pradesh and a Hindu from Karnataka share a common political identity of being Indian irrespective of their different religious and linguistic groups.
Question 5:
How is a democracy more effective than authoritarian governments in dealing with conflicting nationalist aspirations?
Answer:
  A democratic government is more effective than an authoritarian government as it respects the opinion of people and provides opportunity and rights to every cultural group to flourish.
  All cultural groups including those in minorities have the opportunity to be represented at the highest levels of decision making in a democratic set up. Thus, it provides a structure for all groups to express their aspirations.
  An authoritarian government will create an oppressive and authoritative society in which minority groups cannot survive. The dominance of the majority gives rise to nationalist aspirations among other groups in such situations.
  A democratic government respects the rights and cultural identity of minorities and therefore can solve conflicting nationalist aspirations by taking decisions through consensus that benefit all groups which stay inside the democratic set up.
Question 6:
What do you think are the limitations of nationalism?
Answer:
The limitations of nationalism can be cited as:
  Most nationalist ideals are representative of the goals of a single cultural group. Thus, they fail to incorporate the broader vision of inclusiveness.
  Since it is not possible for every cultural group to create its own nation-state therefore every nationstate state has more than one cultural group.
  The different cultural groups often get involved in conflicts due to their separate nationalist aspirations and the principle of exclusivity based upon a desire for homogenous identity.
  The role of nationalism in a globalised world is yet to be completely evaluated as nationalist tendencies acquire a different meaning in an inter-connected world.

Class 11 Political Science NCERT QUESTION ANSWER Chapter 10 - Development PREPARED BY SUMAN KUMAR JHA

Chapter 10 - Development
Question 1:
What do you understand by the term development? Would all sections of society benefit from such a definition of development?
Answer:
Development is a process that ensures good quality of life to all the people in terms of happiness, harmony and satisfaction of essential needs. It is related to improvement, progress and aspirations of people. This definition of development would benefit all the sections of society as it shows the basic need approach. It allows more people to make meaningful choices and the pre-condition for this is the fulfilment of basic needs like food, education, health and shelter.
The previous concepts of development that were based on only economic growth have notbeen beneficial for poor people and environment and have resulted in a wide gap between rich and poor and imbalanced ecology. Therefore, a definition that aims towards improving the quality of people’s life would justify the essence of development.
Question 2:
Discuss some of the social and ecological costs of the kind of development which has been pursued in most countries.
Answer:
Social costs of development
  A large number of people have been displaced from their homes and localities due to industrialisation.
  Displacement causes loss of livelihood and increased impoverishment along with destruction of local culture and community life.
  Displacement of rural agricultural communities has resulted in increased number of urban and rural poor and has brought them into the category of marginalised people.
  It is responsible for many struggles and social disorganisation.
Ecological costs of development
  The present model of development is dependent upon increasing use of energy and is a major cause for environmental degradation.
  Consumption of fossil fuels to meet energy requirements is also a major cause of pollution as well as depletion of natural resources.
Global warming has increased due to emission of pollutant gases from industries.
Icebergs of polar regions are melting due to global warming. This would cause flooding and submergence of low lying areas like Bangladesh and Maldives.
  Developmental projects have resulted in deforestation, which has created the problem of green house effect, scarcity of firewood, medicinal herbs and food, affecting poor people.
  Rivers and ponds are dry up and level of ground water has decreased.
Question 3:
What are some of the new claims for rights which the process of development has generated?
Answer:
The new claims for rights that have been generated by the process of development are as follows:
The protection of people affected by development from the state and the society as a whole.
The right of people to be consulted about decisions that affect their lives.
The right to livelihood of people when their regular livelihood activities are threatened by developmental activities.
Rights of communities, particularly tribal and aboriginal, to the use of natural resources.
Rights of future generations to the resources that are common to the entire humanity.
Question 4:
What would be the advantages of democracy over other forms of government for ensuring that decisions regarding development are made to promote the common good?
Answer:
The advantages of democracy over other forms of government for ensuring common good as the aims of development are as follows:
  A democratic government ensures that the decisions regarding development are taken while keeping the common interest of people in concern and respecting the rights of all.
  Conflicts over resources and different versions of the good life are resolved through debate in a democracy and these cannot be imposed from the higher authorities.
  The developmental priorities, strategies and way of implementations are decided by higher level of political leaders and bureaucrats.
  Democratic structure also makes it possible to include the views of common people in the strategy and priorities of development to prevent discrimination and adverse effects.
  Democracy allows every citizen to have a stake and participate in deciding their future and nation’s priorities.
  Other forms of governments like authoritarian, monarchical and dictatorship do not involve people in decision making process of development.
Question 5:
In your view how successful have popular struggles been in making the state responsive to the social and environmental costs of development? Discuss with examples.
Answer:
Popular struggles like the Narmada Bachao Andolan and the Chipko movement have played a major role in making the state responsive to the social and environmental costs of development.
The Narmada Bachao Aandolan has stopped the government for the time being from raising the height of Sardar Sarovar dam on River Narmada. This project was harmful for the environment and social life of the people. A large forest was submerged during the construction and many people were displaced. The activists have also been trying to persuade the government to offer more meaningful rehabilitation packages to the displaced people.
The Chipko Movement against deforestation was successful in Uttrakhand. The people hugged the trees and stopped the contractors from cutting them down. This was basically an environmental movement but the livelihood of the local people also depended on these forests. Thus, it created awareness all over the country about the actions of the government and forced the state to become more responsive.

Class 11 Political Science Chapter 8 - Secularism NCERT Question Answer PREPARED BY SUMAN KUMAR JHA

Chapter 8 - Secularism
Question 1:
Which of the following do you feel are compatible with the idea of secularism? Give reasons.
(a) Absence of domination of one religious group by another.
(b) Recognition of a state religion.
(c) Equal state support to all religions.
(d) Mandatory prayers in schools.
(e) Allowing separate educational institutions for any minority community.
(f) Appointment of temple management bodies by the government.
(g) Intervention of state to ensure entry of Dalits in temples.
Answer:
Any answer supported with argument or explanation would solve the purpose. It is strongly recommended that you prepare the solution on your own. However, a sample solution has been provided for your reference:
(a) Absence of domination of one religious group over another is compatible with the idea of secularism as it allows freedom to all religious groups.
(c) Equal state support to all religions is compatible with the idea of secularism as it provides a chance to every religion to preserve it’s traditions and flourish.
(e) Allowing separate educational institutions for any minority is compatible with the idea of secularism as this will provide right to the minority to maintain it’s cultural identity and a chance to develop.
(g) Intervention of state to ensure entry of Dalits in temples is compatible with the idea of secularism as it prevents discrimination and provides equal rights to every social group.
Question 2:
Some of the key characteristics of western and Indian model of secularism have got mixed up. Separate them and make a new table.
Western Secularism Indian Secularism
Strict non-interference of religion and state in each other’s affairs State supported religious reforms allowed
Equality between different religious groups is a key concern Equality between different sects of a religion is emphasised
Attention to minority rights Less attention to community based rights
Individual and his rights at the centre Rights of both individual and religious community protected.
Answer:
Western Secularism Indian Secularism
Strict non-interference of religion and state in each other’s affairs State supported religious reforms allowed
Less attention to community based rights Attention to minority rights
Equality between different sects of a religion is emphasised Equality between different religious groups is a key concern
Individual and his rights at the centre Rights of both individual and religious community protected
Question 3:
What do you understand by secularism? Can it be equated with religious tolerance?
Answer:
  Secularism is a doctrine that opposes any form of religious and intra-religious domination. It does not oppose religion itself.
  Secularism cannot be equated with religious tolerance as tolerance may be compatible with religious domination by one group.
  However, religious tolerance is one of the components of secularism.
Question 4:
Do you agree with the following statements? Give reasons for supporting or opposing any of them.
(a) Secularism does not allow us to have a religious identity.
(b) Secularism is against inequality within a religious group or between different religious groups.
(c) Secularism has a western-Christian origin. It is not suitable for India.
Answer:
Any answer supported with argument or explanation would solve the purpose. It is strongly recommended that you prepare the solution on your own. However, a sample solution has been provided for your reference:
(a) Secularism allows us to have a religious identity. In India, a citizen can have a religious identity, sothat he/she can represent his/her religious institution whenever required in order to preserve and develop it.
(b) Secularism is against inequality both within a religious group and between different religiousgroups. The Indian government tries to maintain equality within religious groups to prevent discrimination and eradicate practices that are derogatory to human dignity.
(c) Secularism may have a western-Christian origin but it is suitable for India. This is due to the factthat India is a multi-cultural and religious society. Thus, it is necessary to ensure equal treatment to all groups both within and between different religions to maintain harmony and integrate the country.
Question 5:
Indian secularism focuses on more than the religion-state separation. Explain.
Answer:
  Indian secularism does not focus on the religion-state separation alone; it is also concerned with maintaining harmony between different religions and reforming religious practices to protect the social and civil rights of its citizens.
Indian secularism allows every religion to flourish and develop.
The Indian state allows the promotion of all religions and treats each of them equally.
Therefore state does not interfere in religious matters but it checks the influence of religion in public life.
Question 6:
Explain the concept of principled distance.
Answer:
  According to the concept of principled distance, a secular state may keep a principled distance from religion to promote peace between communities and it may also intervene to protect the rights of specific communities.
  The state gives equal preference to every religion and respects them all equally.However, the state may interfere if religious groups try to exercise their power on the political and social life of the people.
This balanced distance of state from religious groups is called principled distance.

July 25, 2021

Ranga’s Marriage Class 11 summary in hindi, English and Question and Answer

Ranga’s Marriage Class 11 summary in hindi

Summary in Hindi


मस्ती वेंकटेश अयंगर (Masti Venkatesh Iyengar) द्वारा रंगा की शादी, एक लड़के की कहानी है जो बैंगलोर से अंग्रेजी माध्यम में शिक्षा प्राप्त करने के बाद अपने गांव लौटता है। लड़का गाँव के मुनीम का बेटा है। वे मैसूर के होशली गाँव में रहते हैं। जब लड़का लौटता है, तो पूरे गाँव में उसे देखने के लिए लोग उत्साहित हो जाते हैं। वे जानना चाहते हैं की बाहर जाने से उसके व्यक्तित्व में कोई बदलाव आया है क्या।

हालांकि, जैसे ही वे लोग आये तो रंगा ने उन्हें पारंपरिक तरीके से नमस्कार किया जिससे उनका उत्साह गायब हो गया और फिर एक-एक करके वे वहां से चले गए।

कहानी एक पहले व्यक्ति की कहानी है और कहानी का एक बड़ा हिस्सा अतीत की यादों में है। वक्ता सीधे पाठक को संबोधित करता है। कथाकार रंगा का पड़ोसी है। वह पहले अपने गाँव होशली का विस्तृत विवरण देकर कहानी को एक अंतर के साथ पेश करता है। वह अपने गाँव के आमों की तारीफ करता है।

वह पाठक से पूछता है कि क्या उसने कभी गाँव के बारे में सुना है। वह खुद ही इस सवाल का जवाब देता है, क्योंकि गाँव अंग्रेजी बाबुओं के लिए किसी भी नक्शे में नहीं था और हमारे देश के लोग इसे लगाना भूल गए थे। फिर वह दस साल पहले एक समय में नायक, रंगा का परिचय देता है। रंगा पढ़ाई के लिए बैंगलोर गए थे और छह महीने बाद घर लौटे थे।

यह वह समय था जब अंग्रेजी लोकप्रिय नहीं थी और कुछ लोग इसका इस्तेमाल करते थे। सभी कन्नड़ में विश्वास करते थे। सभी ग्रामीण रंगा के स्थान पर पहुंचे और उसकी छानबीन करने लगे। हालांकि, वह अभी भी वही पुराना रंगा था और वे निराश हो गए थे। हालाँकि, कथावाचक रंगा के घर रुके और लड़के के साथ कुछ बातें की और फिर चले गए। दोपहर बाद, रंगा कुछ संतरे के साथ कथावाचक के घर पहुंचा।

कथावाचक ने लड़के को जज किया और ऐसे पढ़े-लिखे और विनम्र लड़के की शादी कराना उचित समझा। हालाँकि, रंगा के पास शादीशुदा आदमी के रूप में बसने की कोई योजना नहीं थी। उन्होंने कथाकार के सामने शादी के बारे में अपने विचार रखे कि वह एक ऐसी लड़की से शादी करना चाहता है जो परिपक्व हो और जिसकी रंगा प्रशंसा कर सके।

रंगा ने चर्चा के बाद अपने घर प्रस्थान किया और कथावाचक ने फैसला किया कि वह उस लड़के की शादी करेगा। निश्चित रूप से, वह राम राव की भतीजी रत्ना को रंगा के लिए उपयुक्त दुल्हन के रूप में मानने लगे। वह एक बड़े शहर से थीं और वीणा और हारमोनियम बजाना जानती थीं। वह एक योजना लेकर आया था। उन्होंने राम राव की पत्नी को कुछ छाछ लाने के लिए रत्ना(राव की बेटी) को उनके स्थान पर भेजने के लिए कहा।

इसलिए वह शुक्रवार को एक भव्य साड़ी पहनकर आई थी। उन्होंने रत्ना से गाने का अनुरोध किया और रंगा को बुलाया। रंगा कथावाचक के स्थान पर पहुँच गया और कमरे के बाहर रुक गया क्योंकि वह गायन को बाधित नहीं करना चाहता था, लेकिन उसके चेहरे को इतनी गहराई से देखने के लिए उत्सुक था। रत्ना ने अजनबी को देखा और अचानक रुक गई। रंगा अंदर आया और लड़की वहां से चली गई।

उत्सुकता से उसने लड़की के बारे में पूछताछ की और कथावाचक ने बड़ी चतुराई से उसके शब्दों को बयां किया। उन्होंने रंगा को बताया कि लड़की की एक साल पहले शादी हो गई थी और उसने रंगा के चेहरे पर निराशा को देखा। वह यह सुनकर दुखी हो गया था। कथाकार खुश था क्योंकि उसकी योजना काम कर रही थी।

अपने अगले कदम के रूप में, अगले दिन कथाकार रंगा को एक ज्योतिषी के पास ले गया, जिसे उसने पहले ही बता दिया था कि उसे क्या कहना है। जब वे ज्योतिषी के पास होते हैं तो कथावाचक के नाम का खुलासा होता है जोकि श्यामा है। ज्योतिषी ने रंगप्पा के चार्ट को पढ़ने का नाटक किया और घोषित किया कि लड़का एक लड़की से प्यार करता था जिसका नाम सागर में पाया गया था।

श्यामा ने कहा कि यह रत्ना, रामा राव की भतीजी हो सकती है। रंगा की मुस्कान श्यामा से छिपी नहीं थी। लेकिन लड़की की शादी हो चुकी थी!

कथावाचक लड़के को रामा राव के घर ले गए और उसे बाहर इंतजार करने के लिए कहा। जब वह बाहर आया तो उसने पुष्टि की कि लड़की की शादी नहीं हुई थी, पहले उनके पास कुछ गलत जानकारी थी। यहाँ तक कि रंगा ने भी स्वीकार किया कि वह लड़की की ओर आकर्षित हो गया था।

बाद में ज्योतिषी और कथाकार के बीच एक वार्तालाप का वर्णन किया जाता है कि ज्योतिषी कैसे कहता है कि यद्यपि कथाकार ने उसे सुराग दिया था, वह ज्योतिष के माध्यम से खुद ही यह सब पता लगा सकता था।

कहानी दस साल आगे बढ़ती है, या कहने के लिए, वर्तमान में लौटती है। रंगप्पा एक दिन कथावाचक के पास आए, उन्हें अपने बेटे श्यामा के तीसरे जन्मदिन पर आमंत्रित किया। जाहिर है, रत्ना और रंगा की शादी हो चुकी थी। और अब उनका एक तीन साल का बेटा है, जिसे रंगा ने कथावाचक के नाम पर रखा है।


Ranga’s Marriage Summary in English


It all begins when Ranga, the accountant’s son comes back to his village Hosahalli after six months. He had gone to Bangalore to pursue his studies, which to mention, not many in the village get this opportunity. The whole village gets excited to see Ranga and thus, they gather around his home only to see how he would have changed.
The narrator has beautifully elaborated about their village Hosahalli and how every authority responsible forgot to mention it in the maps. Moving on, he admires Ranga and wants to get him married but to his dismay, Ranga has very different views about marriage at that point. The Narrator stages the entire union of Ranga and Ratna, Rama Rao’s eleven-year-old niece.
The girl has a very sweet voice and can play Veena and harmonium. At first, the narrator tells him that she is married to see how it affects Ranga. As expected, Ranga was disappointed. The narrator then manipulated the village Shastri to say things in his favor.
He then took Ranga to visit him where he predicted that Ranga has a girl on his mind and her name resembles something found in the ocean. Shyama, the narrator guesses her name to be Ratna but again, she is married. On their way back, they confirmed that Ratna is not married only to find Ranga happy and full of hope.
On the other hand, the Shastri disagreed on having staged anything predetermined. He claims to have said whatever his predictions showed. However, at the end, Ranga and Ratna are happily married with a three- year old son named after the narrator. Ratna is also pregnant with another child. To conclude, the narrator makes sure that he didn’t bore his readers.


Ranga’s Marriage Lesson Explanation


Ranga, the accountant’s son, is one of the rare breeds among the village folk who has been to the city to pursue his studies. When he returns to his village from the city of Bangalore, the crowds mill around his house to see whether he has changed or not. His ideas about marriage are now quite different—or are they?
Rare breed- a person or thing with characteristics that are uncommon among their kind; a rarity
The lesson revolves around Ranga, the village accountant’s son who had just come back from Bangalore. At the news of his arrival, the villagers gather at his home to analyse if he had changed or not and what is his perception about marriage. Everyone was so excited because during those days, not everyone used to get a chance to go to cities for studying.

WHEN you see this title, some of you may ask, “Ranga’s Marriage?” Why not “Ranganatha Vivaha” or “Ranganatha Vijaya?” Well, yes. I know I could have used some other mouth-filling one like “Jagannatha Vijaya” or “Girija Kalyana.” But then, this is not about Jagannatha’s victory or Girija’s wedding. It’s about our own Ranga’s marriage and hence no fancy title. Hosahalli is our village. You must have heard of it. No? What a pity! But it is not your fault. There is no mention of it in any geography book. Those sahibs in England, writing in English, probably do not know that such a place exists, and so make no mention of it. Our own people too forget about it. You know how it is —they are like a flock of sheep. One sheep walks into a pit, the rest blindly follow it. When both, the sahibs in England and our own geographers, have not referred to it, you can not expect the poor cartographer to remember to put it on the map, can you? And so there is not even the shadow of our village on any map


The narrator expects the readers to be questioning the simplicity of the title “Ranga’s Marriage”. He feels readers might be thinking of fancier titles like “Ranganatha Vivaha”,“Ranganatha Vijaya” or “Girija Kalyana”. He clarifies that although he had options of keeping such elaborate names, the reason why he chose the basic and casual one is because the story is about “our Ranga” as in, someone who is very close and dear to him. They live in a village called Hosahalli in Mysore. Not many people know of it and the narrator does not blame them because there is no trace of it in the geography books. Even the Englishmen have no idea about the place but they are also not to blame because our citizens too, are completely ignorant about his village. He refers to the people as “sheep” who blindly follow each other and do not use their logic or brain to justify or invent things. At last, he feels the cartographer is also not to be held responsible. As a result, there is no trace of their village on the map.

Sorry, I started somewhere and then went off in another direction. If the state of Mysore is to Bharatavarsha what the sweet karigadabu is to a festive meal, then Hosahalli is to Mysore State what the filling is to the karigadabu. What I have said is absolutely true, believe me. I will not object to your questioning it but I will stick to my opinion. I am not the only one who speaks glowingly of Hosahalli. We have a doctor in our place. His name is Gundabhatta. He agrees with me. He has been to quite a few places. No, not England. If anyone asks him whether he has been there, he says, “No, annayya , I have left that to you. Running around like a flea-pestered dog, is not for me. I have seen a few places in my time, though.” As a matter of fact, he has seen many.

Flea-pestered dog- A flea- pestered dog does not stick to one place but keeps roaming everywhere.Flea-pestered means being infested by fleas and ticks which can cause uncontrollable itching in animals
The narrator feels apologetic for getting carried away and deviating from the topic. He then again throws light upon the significance of the village Hosahalli. He says it is just as important as Mysore is to India, Karigadabu to a festive meal and filling is to Karigadabu. Thus, he can’t highlight its importance any more. Not only him, but the doctor named Gundabhatta feels the same. The doctor has been to many places except England but he still loves Hosahalli. However, an outsider might contest this but the narrator claims to stick to his opinion of the place.

We have some mango trees in our village. Come visit us, and I will give you a raw mango from one of them. Do not eat it. Just take a bite. The sourness is sure to go straight to your brahmarandhra . I once took one such fruit home and a chutney was made out of it. All of us ate it. The cough we suffered from, after that! It was when I went for the cough medicine, that the doctor told me about the special quality of the fruit
Brahmarandhra-(in Kannada) the soft part in a child’s head where skull bones join later. Here, used as an idiomatic expression to convey the extreme potency of sourness. In Sanskrit, “Brahmarandhra” means the hole of Brahman. It is the dwelling house of the human soul.
Then he tells the readers about their special mango trees in the village whose mangoes are famous for their special quality. He once took the fruit at home to make chutney and everyone suffered from a bad cough after eating it. It was only when he went to see the doctor, that he told him about the quality of mangoes of Hosahalli. The narratorasks the readers to take a bite and assures that the sourness of the mango will be felt by them till the top of their head (where Brahmarandhra is located).

Just as the mango is special, so is everything else around our village. We have a creeper growing in the ever-so-fine water of the village pond. Its flowers are a feast to behold. Get two leaves from the creeper when you go to the pond for your bath, and you will not have to worry about not having leaves on which to serve the afternoon meal. You will say I am rambling. It is always like that when the subject of our village comes up. But enough. If any one of you would like to visit us, drop me a line. I will let you know where Hosahalli is and what things are like here. The best way of getting to know a place is to visit it, don’t you agree?
Behold- see or observe (someone or something, especially of remarkable or impressive nature)
Rambling- (of writing or speech) lengthy and confused or inconsequential
Not only  the mangoes, everything in and around this village is remarkable. The creeper growing in the pond and its flowers are also special. One can even serve an afternoon meal on its leaves, all you need to do is to grab two leaves when you are on your way to the pond to bathe. After speaking highly of his village, the narrator says if anyone wishes to see for himself/herself, one must contact him. He will help them to reach there. Also, he feels that there is no better way to know a place than to visit it.

What I am going to tell you is something that happened ten years ago. We did not have many people who knew English, then. Our village accountant was the first one who had enough courage to send his son to Bangalore to study. It is different now. There are many who know English. During the holidays, you come across them on every street, talking in English. Those days, we did not speak in English, nor did we bring in English words while talking in Kannada. What has happened is disgraceful, believe me. The other day, I was in Rama Rao’s house when they bought a bundle of firewood. Rama Rao’s son came out to pay for it. He asked the woman, “How much should I give you?” “Four pice,” she said. The boy told her he did not have any “change”, and asked her to come the next morning. The poor woman did not understand the English word “change” and went away muttering to herself. I too did not know. Later, when I went to Ranga’s house and asked him, I understood what it meant.
The narrator then brings about a comparison as to how things were different ten years ago when not many people knew or spoke English. Neither did people send their children to big cities like Bangalore to study. Back then, only the village accountant had the courage to send his son to Bangalore. According to the author, those times were simpler. He justifies his claim by telling an incident where he was at Rama Rao’s house and they had just bought a bundle of firewood from an old lady. Rama told her to come next morning as he did not have any change at the moment. The poor old lady did not know what “change” meant and she went away whispering to herself. Neither did the narrator know its meaning. It was only when he went to Ranga’s house, that he told him.

This priceless commodity, the English language, was not so widespread in our village a decade ago. That was why Ranga’s homecoming was a great event. People rushed to his doorstep announcing, “The accountant’s son has come,” “The boy who had gone to Bangalore for his studies is here, it seems,” and “Come, Ranga is here. Let’s go and have a look.”
However, ten years ago, english was not commonly spoken in this village and when the villagers came to know that Ranga, the accountant’s son was coming home from Bangalore, everyone got excited and rushed to his home to have a glance at him.

Attracted by the crowd, I too went and stood in the courtyard and asked, “Why have all these people come? There’s no performing monkey here.” A boy, a fellow without any brains, said, loud enough for everyone to hear, “What are you doing here, then?” A youngster, immature and without any manners. Thinking that all these things were now of the past, I kept quiet.
Fascinated by all the crowd, the narrator too, went there and asked people as to why they were gathered because he couldn’t see anything entertaining happening there like a monkey performing. A boy “without brains” shouted loud enough for everyone to hear and in a rude way. The narrator called him immature.

Seeing so many people there, Ranga came out with a smile on his face. Had we all gone inside, the place would have turned into what people call the Black Hole of Calcutta. Thank God it did not. Everyone was surprised to see that Ranga was the same as he had been six months ago, when he had first left our village. An old lady who was near him, ran her hand over his chest, looked into his eyes and said, “The janewara is still there. He hasn’t lost his caste.” She went away soon after that. Ranga laughed.

All the people were waiting outside Ranga’s house because the place would look like the “Black Hole of Calcutta” if they all went inside. By saying this, the narrator means that there were so many people that the house would have fallen short to accommodate them all. Thus, Ranga came outside with a smile on his face. Everyone was so amazed to see that Ranga had not changed a bit after he left 6 months ago. An old lady even went to the extent of running her hands through his chest to check for a sacred thread. However, she went away after confirming that he had not forgotten about his caste.

Once they realised that Ranga still had the same hands, legs, eyes and nose, the crowd melted away, like a lump of sugar in a child’s mouth. I continued to stand there.


After everyone had gone, I asked, “How are you, Rangappa? Is everything well with you?” It was only then that Ranga noticed me. He came near me and did a namaskara respectfully, saying, “I am all right, with your blessings.”
Once the villagers realised that Ranga did not change even after moving to the city, they disappeared as fast as a lump of sugar does in a child’s mouth. The narrator waited till the crowd cleared and asked him about his well-being. Ranga noticed him and replied with full respect in a traditional way. Ranga had not noticed the narrator in the crowd before that moment.

I must draw your attention to this aspect of Ranga’s character. He knew when it would be to his advantage to talk to someone and rightly assessed people’s worth. As for his namaskara to me, he did not do it like any present-day boy—with his head up towards the sun, standing stiff like a pole without joints, jerking his body as if it was either a wand or a walking stick. Nor did he merely fold his hands. He bent low to touch my feet. “May you get married soon,” I said, blessing him. After exchanging a few pleasantries, I left.
Ranga was very well-behaved and well-aware as to who could benefit him. He was one of those who could analyse someone’s worth rightfully. For how he greeted the narrator, he bent low and touched his feet thereby seeking his blessings. It was not the present day namaskara where children would do it casually, it was a proper, traditional one. The narrator blessed him that he might get married soon and then, left.

That afternoon, when I was resting, Ranga came to my house with a couple of oranges in his hand. A generous, considerate fellow. It would be a fine thing to have him marry, settle down and be of service to society, I thought. For a while we talked about this and that. Then I came to the point. “Rangappa, when do you plan to get married?” “I am not going to get married now,” he said. “Why not?” “I need to find the right girl. I know an officer who got married only six months ago. He is about thirty and his wife is twenty-five, I am told. They will be able to talk lovingly to each other. Let’s say I married a very young girl. She may take my words spoken in love as words spoken in anger. Recently, a troupe in Bangalore staged the play Shakuntala. There is no question of Dushyantha falling in love with Shakuntala if she were young, like the present-day brides, is there? What would have happened to Kalidasa’s play? If one gets married, it should be to a girl who is mature. Otherwise, one should remain a bachelor. That’s why I am not marrying now.”

That afternoon, Ranga visited the author with a few oranges which the narrator thought was quite thoughtful of him. Thinking of how nice Ranga is, the author thought it would be a good deed to have him married to a girl just as nice as him. They chatted for a while and then the narrator asked Ranga about his views on getting married. Ranga expresses that he doesn’t intend on marrying now because he intends on finding the right girl. He cites the example of an officer who got married at the age of thirty to a woman aged twenty-five. Now since these are both adults, they would understand each other’s actions and behaviour. Whereas suppose the narrator finds a girl who is very young, she could misunderstand his words or actions because she is not mature enough. He even mentions the love story of Shakuntala and Dushyantha from Mahabharata and that he would not have fallen in love with Shakuntala if she were too young. In that case, Kalidasa’s play also would have not existed. That is why he intends on staying a bachelor till he finds the right girl.

“Is there any other reason?” “A man should marry a girl he admires. What we have now are arranged marriages. How can one admire a girl with milk stains on one side of her face and wetness on the other, or so young that she doesn’t even know how to bite her fingers?” “One a neem fruit, the other, a bittergourd.” “Exactly!” Ranga said, laughing. I was distressed that the boy who I thought would make a good husband, had decided to remain a bachelor. After chatting for a little longer, Ranga left. I made up my mind right then, that I would get him married.

Rama Rao’s niece, a pretty girl of eleven, had come to stay with him. She was from a big town, so she knew how to play the veena and the harmonium. She also had a sweet voice. Both her parents had died, and her uncle had brought her home. Ranga was just the boy for her, and she, the most suitable bride for him.
Here, the narrator introduces us to a new character in the story named Ratna. She is eleven years old and is Rama Rao’s niece. She had lost both her parents so her uncle brought her from the big town to his home with him. She had a great voice and could play harmonium and veena. The narrator thought that Ranga and Ratna would make a great pair.

Since I was a frequent visitor to Rama Rao’s place, the girl was quite free with me. I completely forgot to mention her name! Ratna, it was. The very next morning I went to their house and told Rama Rao’s wife, “I’ll send some buttermilk for you. Ask Ratna to fetch it.” Ratna came. It was a Friday, so she was wearing a grand saree. I told her to sit in my room and requested her to sing a song. I sent for Ranga. While she was singing the song— Krishnamurthy, in front of my eyes — Ranga reached the door. He stopped at the threshold. He did not want the singing to stop, but was curious to see the singer. Carefully, he peeped in. The light coming into the room was blocked. Ratna looked up and seeing a stranger there, abruptly stopped
Threshold- a strip of wood or stone forming the bottom of a doorway and crossed in entering a house or a room
Ratna was quite familiar with the narrator as he visited Rama’s place frequently. The narrator thought of a plan to introduce Ratna to Ranga. He asked Rama to send Ratna to his place as he wanted to send some buttermilk for them. She came all dressed up. The narrator insisted upon her to sing a song while he sent someone to call Ranga. Just as she was singing, Ranga arrived at the door. Her melancholic voice touched his ears and thus, he did not want to interrupt the singing so he stood at the door. He was curious to see the singer and very cautiously he tried to have a look which disturbed the lighting in the room. On seeing a stranger, Ratna immediately stopped her singing.

Suppose you buy the best quality mango. You eat it slowly, savouring its peel, before biting into the juicy flesh. You do not want to waste any part of it. Before you take another bite, the fruit slips out of your hand and falls to the ground. How do you feel? Ranga’s face showed the same disappointment when the singing stopped. “You sent for me?” he asked as he came in and sat on a chair. Ratna stood at a distance, her head lowered. Ranga repeatedly glanced at her. Once, our eyes met, and he looked very embarrassed. No one spoke for a long while.
The narrator compares Ranga’s situation to the disappointment of dropping a best quality mango on the floor just before having to truly enjoy it. It was as if something great had been stolen before one could fully enjoy it. Ranga asked the narrator why he called for him. Ratna was shy and thus, looked  downward whereas Ranga stealthily glanced at her. There was an awkward silence in the room.

“It was my coming in that stopped the singing. Let me leave.” Words, mere words! The fellow said he would leave but did not make a move. How can one expect words to match actions in these days of Kaliyuga? Ratna ran inside, overcome by shyness
After things went a bit awkward, Ranga said that he feels it was his coming that stopped the singing so he must leave. However, he did not. The narrator makes fun of him because he had no intention of going. He jokes about it and says one can not expect actions and words to match in the Kalyuga.

After a while, Ranga asked, “Who is that girl, swami?” “Who’s that inside?” the lion wanted to know. The he-goat who had taken shelter in the temple replied, “Does it matter who I am? I am a poor animal who has already eaten nine lions. I have vowed to eat one more. Tell me, are you male or female?” The lion fled the place in fear, it seems. Like the he-goat, I said, “What does it matter to either of us who she is? I’m already married and you aren’t the marrying kind.”
After a few minutes of awkward silence, Ranga finally asked the narrator about the girl. Now the narrator compares the situation with the infamous story of the he-goat and the lion where he is the he-goat and Ranga, the lion. The narrator replies very cleverly and intends on seeing Ranga’s interest in knowing about Ratna. Thus, he says that who she is, is not of that much importance because he is already married and Ranga doesn’t intend on marrying anytime soon.

Very hopefully, he asked, “She isn’t married, then?” His voice did not betray his excitement but I knew it was there. “She was married a year ago.” His face shrivelled like a roasted brinjal. After a while, Ranga left, saying, “I must go, I have work at home.” I went to our Shastri the next morning and told him, “Keep everything ready to read the stars. I’ll come later.” I tutored him in all that I wanted him to say. I found no change in Ranga when I met him that afternoon. “What’s the matter? You seem to be lost in thought,” I said. “Nothing, nothing’s wrong, believe me.” “Headache? Come, let’s go and see a doctor.”




Hearing the narrator’s reply, Ranga got excited, although he did not show it but was quite evident. Full of hope, he asks if she isn’t married yet to which the narrator replies that she is, probably a year ago. Ranga was disappointed and disheartened. It was clearly all over his face. He went away quoting some work. Our narrator, having staged certain liking in the mind of Ranga for Ratna, went on to complete his play. He went to the village Shastri and told him everything that had to be said and done. Then, he met Ranga that afternoon and he carried the same disappointment on his face. Upon asking if it’s a headache, the narrator tells him that they should go see a doctor.

“I have no headache. I’m my usual self.” “I went through the same thing when the process of choosing a girl for me was going on. But I don’t think that that could be a reason for your present condition.” Ranga stared at me. “Come, let’s go and see Shastri,” I suggested. “We will find out whether Guru and Shani are favourable for you or not.” Ranga accompanied me without any protest. As soon as Shastri saw me, he exclaimed, “What a surprise, Shyama! Haven’t seen you for a long time.”
Ranga insists that everything is fine with him and he is his normal self. Narrator, very wittily, makes a remark that he went through the same feelings when he was seeing girls for himself and immediately mentions that it could not be the reason for Ranga. Furthermore, he suggested that they go see Shastri to see if the stars (Guru for Jupiter and Shani for Saturn) are in their favour. Ranga went with him. On seeing Shastri ji, he implied not having seen the narrator in a long while, which is obviously not true as they had met before, the same morning.

Shyama is none other than your servant, the narrator of this tale. I got angry and shouted, “What? Only this morning...” Shastri completed my sentence, “You finished all your work and are now free to visit me.” Had he not done so, I would have ruined our plan by bursting like grains that are kept in the sun to dry. I was extremely careful of what I said afterwards. Shastri turned to Ranga. “When did the young son of our accountant clerk come home? What can I do for him? It’s very rarely that he visits us.”
Here, the narrator reveals his pet name, Shyama as they called him in the village. The narrator felt that Shastri was lying because they saw each other that morning and thus he immediately responded. However, Shastri completed his sentence and saved the entire situation. Shyama realised what he was just about to do and took extra care from that moment. Shastri continued his role and acted surprised on seeing Ranga.

“Take out your paraphernalia. Our Rangappa seems to have something on his mind. Can you tell us what’s worrying him? Shall we put your science of astrology to the test?” There was authority in my voice as I spoke to Shastri. He took out two sheets of paper, some cowries and a book of palmyra leaves, saying, “Ours is an ancient science, ayya. There’s a story to it... But I won’t tell you that story now. This is not a harikatha which allows you to tell a story within a story... You may get bored. I’ll tell it to you some other time.”



The narrator asks the Shastri to take out all his tools to help solve whatever is going on in Ranga’s mind with full authority. Shastri took out his essentials and told them that this is all ancient science but he won’t recite it now because then they both would get bored but he does intend on telling it some other time.

Shastri moved his lips fast as he counted on his fingers and then asked, “What’s your star?” Ranga didn’t know. “Never mind,” Shastri indicated with a shake of his head. He did some more calculations before saying in a serious tone, “It’s about a girl.” I had been controlling my laughter all this while. But now I burst out laughing. I turned to Ranga. “Exactly what I had said.” “Who is the girl?” It was your humble servant who asked the question.
Shastri moved his lips while counting quickly and asked Ranga about his star which he did not know. Shastri implied that it’s manageable. He appeared to be doing certain calculations. After a moment, he indicated that Ranga has a girl on her mind. Even after trying his best,  Shyama could not control his laughter. He thus, posed the question to Shastri asking about the details of the girl.

Shastri thought for a while before replying, “She probably has the name of something found in the ocean.” “Kamala?” “Maybe.”
“Could it be Pachchi, moss?” “Must it be moss if it’s not Kamala? Why not pearl or ratna, the precious stone?” “Ratna? The girl in Rama Rao’s house is Ratna. Tell me, is there any chance of our negotiations bearing fruit?” “Definitely,” he said, after thinking for some time. There was a surprise on Ranga’s face. And some happiness. I noticed it. “But that girl is married...” I said, Then I turned to him. His face had fallen
Shastri thought and thought and replied that the girl is likely to have a name of something found in the ocean. Their guesses include Kamala, Pachchi, moss, pearl and then suddenly Shastri said Ratna. All of it came together now to a girl named Ratna, who is the niece of Rama Rao. That’s it, Ranga was thinking about her only. Ranga was both surprised and happy because Shastri’s predictions were right. He immediately became disappointed when he recalled that she was married.

“I don’t know all that. There may be some other girl who is suitable. I only told you what our shastra indicated,” Shastri said. We left the place. On the way, we passed by Rama Rao’s house. Ratna was standing at the door. I went in alone and came out a minute later.
Shastri said that he did not know all that and there might be another suitable girl. To make it look real, Shastri interfered in their name guessing game and told them that he only told what can be read. Both of them left and crossed Rama Rao’s door where Shyama went to see Ratna for a minute and came back.

“Surprising. This girl isn’t married, it seems. Someone told me the other day that she was. What Shastri told us has turned out to be true after all! But Rangappa, I can’t believe that you have been thinking of her. Swear on the name of Madhavacharya and tell me, is it true what Shastri said?”
I do not know whether anyone else would have been direct. Ranga admitted, “There’s greater truth in that shastra than we imagine. What he said is absolutely true.”

When the narrator comes back, he announces that fortunately, Ratna is not married and someone might have wrongly conveyed it to him about that. The narrator expresses his amazement at the fact that he has been thinking about Ratna and asks him to swear upon the truth. To his surprise, Ranga told him the truth that whatever Shastri said is true. His belief in all the Shastras had strengthened.

Shastri was at the well when I went there that evening. I said, “So Shastrigale, you repeated everything I had taught you without giving rise to any suspicion. What a marvellous shastra yours is!” He didn’t like it at all. “What are you saying? What you said to me was what I could have found out myself from the shastras. Don’t forget, I developed on the hints you had given me.” Tell me, is this what a decent man says?

Shyama went to see Shastri that evening when he was near the well and remarked about how well he did what Shyama told him to. Shastri seemed to not like what the narrator was saying. Thus, he says that whatever he said could very clearly be seen in the Shastras. He completely disagreed with having staged the entire conversation.

Rangappa had come the other day to invite me for dinner. “What’s the occasion?” I asked. “It’s Shyama’s birthday. He is three.” “It’s not a nice name —Shyama,” I said. “I’m like a dark piece of oil-cake. Why did you have to give that golden child of yours such a name? What a childish couple you are, Ratna and you! I know, I know, it is the English custom of naming the child after someone you like... Your wife is eight months pregnant now. Who’s there to help your mother to cook?” “My sister has come with her.” I went there for dinner. Shyama rushed to me when I walked in and put his arms round my legs. I kissed him on his cheek and placed a ring on his tiny little finger.
Now, the narrator takes us a few years forward where Ranga and Ratna are happily married, had a three year old son and Ratna was eight months pregnant.Ranga’s sister had come over to help them. It was Shyama’s birthday! Yes, the couple named their son after the narrator as it is a common foreign tradition to name your child after someone you truly admire. When the narrator went there for dinner, Shyama came running to him only to show his love by holding his leg. The narrator kissed him and gave him a ring.
Allow me to take leave of you, reader. I am always here, ready to serve you. You were not bored, I hope?
The narrator writes an ending note to all the readers hoping that they were not bored. 

Ranga’s Marriage Word-Meaning

Vivaha- Marriage
Vijaya- Victory
Girija- female (here)
Kalyana- beautiful, lovely,auspicious in Sanskrit
Sahib- a polite title or form of address for a man
Like a flock of sheep- a group of people behaving in the same way or following what others are doing
Cartographer- a person who draws or produces maps
Betray- portray (here)
Shrivelled- shrunken and wrinkled; especially as a result of loss of moisture
Tutored- taught
Marvellous- causing great wonder; extraordinary
Madhavacharya- an exponent of Vedantic philosophy from South India
Janewara- (in Kannada) the sacred thread worn by Brahmins
Paraphernalia- trappings associated with a particular institution or activity that are regarded as superfluous
Cowries- a marine mollusc which has a glossy, brightly patterned domed shell with a long, narrow opening
Palmyra- palm tree
Harikatha- Story of Lord
Considerate- thoughtful, concerned
Troupe- a group of dancers, actors or other entertainers who tour to different venues
Bharatvarsha- India
Karigadabu- a South Indian fried sweet filled with coconut and sugar
Annayya- (in Kannada) a respectful term for an elder



Ranga’s Marriage Question Answers

https://youtu.be/5ICr2uPfUzM 

Reading with Insight

1. Comment on the influence of English — the language and the way of life — on Indian life as reflected in the story. What is the narrator’s attitude to English?
A. The story talks about the influence English language had decades ago in his village. Not many people in the village at that time could understand or talk in English. Only a few courageous people would send their children to study in cities like the village accountant sent Ranga to Bangalore. When Ranga came back to the village, everyone was keen on seeing how their culture had transformed him.
As far as cultural influence is concerned, the story mentions how Ranga wanted to marry a girl who was mature, someone who understands him and is compatible with him. This is completely in opposition to the arranged marriages that were widely prevalent in those times.
The narrator finds it disgraceful when people mix Kannada language with English. He recounts how one day a lady delivered firewood to Rama Rao’s place and he told her to come the next morning because he had no “change”. The lady did not know what “change” meant and left while muttering to herself. The narrator confesses that he too did not know what it meant until he asked Rama Rao.

 

2. Astrologers’ perceptions are based more on hearsay and conjecture than what they learn from the study of the stars. Comment with reference to the story.
A.The story throws light upon how Shastri predicted what was going on in Ranga’s mind. He did it using two sheets of paper, some cowries and a book of palmyra leaves in the form of his paraphernalia. He even revealed that Ranga has some girl on his mind whose name related to something that belonged to the ocean. All this made Ranga believe in the power of Astrology.
While in reality, it was our narrator Shyama, who had tutored Shastri to say so in a meeting prior to the one with Ranga. Shastri made it seem like no big deal when Ranga left and Shyama called it “his marvellous shastra”. He said he could have guessed it with his numbers even if Shyama had not staged it for him.
Hence, the story portrays Astrologer’s perceptions to be based more on hearsay and conjecture than what they learn from the stars.

 

3. Indian society has moved a long way from the way the marriage is arranged in the story. Discuss.
A.It is true that Indian society has moved a long way from the way the marriage is arranged in the story. Earlier, there was no concept of love marriage and only arranged marriages took place like the one being talked about in the story. Ranga’s marriage was arranged by his uncle Shyama. In present times,  the bride and the groom have a say in the matter unlike decades ago where even their consent was not considered important.

Our society has come a long way since then, especially when it comes to the rights of females.
Earlier, the bride’s families were pressurized into paying dowry which has been illegalised now. It is also against the law to marry individuals who have not yet attained a specific age; 18 in case of girls and 21 in case of boys.

 

4. What kind of a person do you think the narrator is?
A.The narrator is a man of his land as he introduces his village with such enthusiasm that every reader would want to visit it at least once. His hospitality can also be appreciated as he promises to take good care of his readers. He is someone who believes in maintaining the authenticity of his culture that is why, he thinks it’s a disgrace to mix Kannada with English.
He is a man with good judgement of character. He knew what type of man Ranga was and that Rama Rao’s niece Ratna would be a perfect partner for him. Shyama seemed like someone who knows how to make his own way. The whole set-up he staged with the village Shastri in order to get Ranga and Ratna married, pose as evidence for that. He is also funny by way of which he teased the village Shastri. Although clever, he seems to be a man with best intentions at heart.



Ranga’s Marriage Extra Questions and Answers

Ranga’s Marriage Extra Questions Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Why is the village Hosahalli unknown to the world, according to the narrator ?
Answer:
Hosahalli is a small-very small village in Mysore state. The map-makers do not have any information about it. So, they can’t put it on the map.

Question 2.
Who sent his son to Bangalore ? And what for ?
Answer:
The village accountant had sent his son Ranga or Rangappa to the city Of Bangalore for further study. There was no ‘schooling in better spirit there’.

Question 3.
Narrate the disgraceful episode showing the result of using English by Rama Rao’s son.
Answer:
One day Rama Rao’s family bought a bundle of firewood. His son asked the woman how much he should give her. The woman said four pice. The boy told her he did not have any change and asked her to come the next morning. The poor woman did not , understand the English word ‘change’, and went away muttering to herself. The narrator could not know. Later on when he went to Ranga’s house and asked him. Then he understood what it had meant.

Question 4.
Why was Ranga’s homecoming a great event ?
Answer:
Ranga returned the village after having educated in Bangalore. The villagers had ‘a regard’ for him They rushed to his doorstep to have a closer look of the village boy who had come from the city. The innocent people rejoiced the return and celebrated his home¬coming.

Question 5.
What made Ranga come out from his house and spread a smile on his face?
Answer:
As soon as a large crowd of people gathered before the doorstep of Ranga’s house, he came out with a smile on his face. He was the same person in attitude. He respected the , elders and waved his hands in regard.

Question 6.
What made the narrator attract towards Ranga ?
Answer:
The crowd dispersed after having known that Ranga was still the same boy. The narrator stepped a foot and asked how Ranga was. Ranga noticed him, came near and did . a namaskara respectfully. He bent low to touch the narrator’s feet. It attracted him towards .

Question 7.
Why was Ranga against getting married early ?
Answer:
To Ranga one should marry a girl who is mature. Moreover a man should marry k a girl he admires. How one can admire a girl with milk stains on one side of her face and wetness on the other.

Question 8.
Why was the narrator determined to get Ranga marry soon ?
Answer:
The narrator was distressed that the boy who he thought would make a good husband, had decided to remain a bachelor. After chatting for a little longer, Ranga left. The narrator made up his mind that he would get him (Ranga) married.

Question 9.
Who was Ratna ? What were her hobbies ?
Answer:
Ratna was Rama Rao’s niece whose parents had died. Rama Rao took the girl to the village. She had a passion for music. She knew how to play the veena and the harmo¬nium. Moreover she have a sweet voice.

Question 10.
As soon as Ranga stepped in the narrator’s house* his legs stopped at the doorstep. Why ?
Answer:
Ratna was singing a song in the narrator’s room when Ranga stepped in the doorway. He had been invited by the narrator’s himself deliberately. He stopped. He did not want the singing to stop, but was curious to see the female singer.

Question 11.
Why did the narrator tell a lie about Ratna to Ranga when they met first time ? .
Answer:
In order to excite and make him curious the narrator told a lie that Ratna had been married. He wanted to know how much it would affect Ranga.

Question 12.
What affect did telling a lie by the narrator do on Ranga ?
Answer:
As soon as the narrator told Ranga that Ratna was married, Ranga’s face shrivelled like a roasted brinjal. He wanted to leave the room on some pretext that he had some work at him

Question 13.
For what did the narrator meet Shastriji ?
Answer:
The narrator had gone to Shastriji to tutor him about Ranga and Ratna’s relation forecast. He made Shastri speak whatever he himself wanted to tell.

Question 14.
How was the drama played on Ranga ? With what results ?
Answer:
Shastriji made Ranga believe that the stars would match both of them in their tie-up. Ranga married Ratna and started following the family way.

Ranga’s Marriage Extra Questions Long Answer Type

Question 1.
What type of a boy Ranga was before and after getting education in Bangalore ? Have you found any change in him ? Why or not ?
Answer:
Ranga was an accountant’s son in the village. He was a simple as the others there. Before going to Bangalore he was a boy with feelings overflowing from the heart. After getting education, when he returned the village everybody waited to see him and check him whether he had changed or not. The narrator found no change in him as far as regards and respects for elders were concerned.

He was a qualified bachelor with a notion that one should marry a mature girl. Ranga was a man down to earth. He was stuck still to his traditions and customs. He did not come wearing Janewara in the neck and touch the elders’ feet on seeing them. Moreover he used to say namaskara to everybody who came to his house. He was spiritually sound. He still believed in religious ceremonies, and even in stars etc. Ranga alias Rangappa is the mirror to other people in the village.

Question 2.
The villagers of Hosahalli are a flock of sheep following blindly one after the other. Elucidate.
Answer:
The village Hosahalli is a small village in Mysore. It has not been trapped by any „ geographer or Sahibs in England. They do not bother to place it on the map. The villagers are innocent, docile and stuck to their traditional values. They do not want to send their younglings to the cities. But they are not illiterate. Some of them can speak English words but they love their language Kannada very much.

When Ranga turned from Bangalore they rushed to his doorstep to know whether he had changed or not. An old lady who was near him ran her hand over his chest, looked into his eyes and said that the Janewara was still there. It showed their peace-loving, easy to go nature and even simplicity. As soon as they realized that Ranga was still the same as he was six months ago, they dispersed. Only human people can do so. .

Question 3.
How did the narrator plan to Ranga get married with Ratna ? Was he successful ? Explain.
Answer:
Ranga returned to the village after getting study in Bangalore. The narrator felt ; attracted towards him when he touched his feet with folded hands and said namaskara. He determined to get Ranga married soon. Rama Rao brought her niece to the village. Her parents had died earlier. The narrator found a good match in Ratna. He planned to make them united.

One day he invited Ranga deliberately to his house when Ratna was singing a song. Ranga felt attracted towards her. The narrator tutored Shastri to make Ranga believe that Ratna would be a pood match to him. He spread the net and caught Ranga in with his wits and feelings. Both Ranga and Ratna got married later on. The narrator was successful in making them tie in a knot.


Featured Post

All the Prime Ministers of India with Information

All the Prime Ministers of India with  Information   The Prime Ministers of India with some basic information about them: 1.         Jawah...