Showing posts with label Class 10. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Class 10. Show all posts

February 26, 2021

Food Production Class 10 NSQF Subject

Syllabus Overview
Food Production 
Class 10 

Food Production 
Unit 1: Introduction To Cookery

The purpose of cooking food is to break it down from its complex form to simple form so that it can be consumed by the human body. To break down the components of food mainly the protein, fat, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals the effects of heat have to be understood.

Proteins: Protein plays the role of growth and repair, hence a good source of protein is required.

Carbohydrates: This gives energy. Sources of Carbohydrates are Rice, Wheat, Potatoes, Plantain, tapioca, etc. There are two types of heat – moist and dry.

Fats: This provides heat and energy. Sources of fat are meat, eggs, milk, nuts, etc. These are made of triglycerides which are a combination of free fatty acids and glycerol.

Food Production 
Unit 2: Methods Of Cooking

It is one of the important topics of the CBSE Syllabus For Class 10 Food Production. All methods of cooking require any one or more of the following principles:

Radiation: Heat passes through directly on the object that has to be cooked e.g. Grilling. Radiant Heat Source in the oven when broiling Cooking with Radiation

Conduction: This is the process of using metals like pans and utensils for transferring the heat to object e.g. using stainless steel vessels. Heat Source Cooking by Conduction

Convection: This process is the movement of the heated particles of gases or liquids. On heating, the particles expand to become less dense and rise, the cooler particles take their place e.g. Oven.

Induction: This process is to cook with the help of electromagnetic waves e.g. Induction stove

Cooking Methods are divided into three categories:

Moist Heat Methods
Dry Heat Methods
Medium of Fat
Moist Heat Methods: In this method, the heat is conducted to the food product by water or by steam.

Dry Heat Methods: In this method, the heat is conducted without moisture either by using any of the following:

Hot Air: e.g. Oven
Hot Metal: Grill, Salamander
Radiation: Microwave
Medium of Fat: In this method, the heat is conducted with the help of fat.

Shallow Frying
Deep frying

Food Production 
Unit 3: Vegetable & Fruit Cookery

Vegetables and fruits are part of plants that are consumed by humans as food as part of a meal. They are an inseparable part of meals and are an important source of nutrients and fiber.

Classification of vegetables and fruits.
Quality criteria for checking the freshness of vegetables and fruits.
Uses of vegetables and fruits.
Nutritional contribution of vegetables and fruits in the diet.
Identification of various cuts of vegetables and fruits.
Effect of heat on color, texture, and flavor of vegetables.
Ways to preserve nutrients while processing vegetables and fruits.

Food Production 
Unit 4: Soups

Soups are a form of liquid food that is prepared by cooking meat, fish, poultry, vegetables, etc. They are flavored with numerous spices such as a bay leaf, cloves, peppercorns, and herbs such as coriander, thyme, basil to name a few.

Soups are served at the beginning of a meal. Soups are considered healthy food as they are easy to digest, provide nutrients, and a sufficient amount of fluids to the body.

A bowl full of soup usually provides a good amount of carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, and minerals. Soups are served with bread (toast, sticks, rolls, etc).

Food Production 
Unit 5: Salads

In the kitchen, all the types of food are prepared in which salad plays a very important role. A salad can be defined as a combination of raw and cooked ingredients, which is served generally cold with any dressing. Freshness and variety of ingredients are required for a nice salad.

A salad can be defined as a cold dish prepared of various mixtures of raw or cooked vegetables and other food items, usually seasoned with oil, vinegar, or other dressing and sometimes accompanied by meat, fish, or other ingredients.

Classification of Salads The salads can be widely classified as the following types:

Vegetable salad
Fruit salad
Pasta salad
Protein salad

Food Production 
Unit 6: Sandwiches

A sandwich can be defined as a type of food placed between slices of bread. In the case of a sandwich, the bread works as a wrapper to some of the food too. Many variations of sandwiches are available worldwide

February 10, 2021

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Chapter 1 - A Letter To God

Page No 5:<script data-ad-client="ca-pub-5266403293639869" async src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
Question 1: What did Lencho hope for?
ANSWER: Lencho hoped for rains as the only thing that his field of ripe corn needed was a shower.

Question 2: Why did Lencho say the raindrops were like ‘new coins’?
ANSWER: Lencho’s crops were ready for harvest. However, they required a good downpour before harvesting. After a downpour, he could sell the harvest and get money. That is why he compared the raindrops to ‘new coins’.

Question 3: How did the rain change? What happened to Lencho’s fields?

ANSWER: The rain was pouring down. But suddenly, a strong wind began to blow and very large hailstones began to fall along with the rain. The hail rained on the valley for an hour, because of which Lencho’s fields were destroyed. There was not a single leaf left on the trees and the flowers were gone from the plants. The corn was completely destroyed.


Question 4: What were Lencho’s feelings when the hail stopped?

ANSWER: When the hail stopped, Lencho’s soul was filled with sadness. He looked around at his fields and said that even a plague of locusts would have left more than what was left after the hailstorm. He said that they would have no corn that year and they would go hungry. He was full of sorrow.

Page No 6:
Question 1: Who or what did Lencho have faith in? What did he do?

ANSWER: Lencho had faith in God. He had been instructed that God’s eyes see everything, even what is deep in one’s conscience. Therefore, he wrote a letter to God expressing his need for a hundred pesos so that he could sow his field again and live until the crop grew again.

Question 2: Who read the letter?

ANSWER: When the postman saw that the letter was addressed to God, he laughed and took the letter to the postmaster, who then read it.

Question 3: What did the postmaster do then?

ANSWER: In order to keep the writer’s faith in God alive, the postmaster decided to answer the letter. When he read that Lencho needed hundred pesos, he asked for money from his employees. He himself gave a part of his salary. He could not gather the entire amount, but managed to send Lencho a little more than half the amount. He put the money in an envelope addressed to Lencho and signed it ‘God’.

Question 1: Who does Lencho have complete faith in? Which sentences in the story tell you this?

ANSWER: Lencho had complete faith in God. The sentences in the story that show this are as follows:

(i) But in the hearts of all who lived in that solitary house in the middle of the valley, there was a single hope: help from God.

(ii) All through the night, Lencho thought only of his one hope: the help of God, whose eyes, as he had been instructed, see everything, even what is deep in one’s conscience.

(iii) “God,” he wrote, “if you don’t help me, my family and I will go hungry this year.”

(iv) He wrote ‘To God’ on the envelope, put the letter inside and, still troubled, went to town.

(v) God could not have made a mistake, nor could he have denied Lencho what he had requested.

(vi) It said: “God: of the money that I asked for, only seventy pesos reached me. Send me the rest, since I need it very much.”

Question 2: Why does the postmaster send money to Lencho? Why does he sign the letter ‘God’?

ANSWER: The postmaster sent money to Lencho in order to keep Lencho’s faith in God alive. He turned serious when he read Lencho’s letter and wished he had the same faith in God. Even after he saw that Lencho had requested for money, he stuck to his resolution of answering the letter. He gathered as much money as he could and sent it to Lencho. He signed it ‘God’ so that Lencho’s faith would not get shaken.

Question 3: Did Lencho try to find out who had sent the money to him? Why/Why not?

ANSWER: No, Lencho does not try to find out who had sent the money to him. This is because he never suspected that it could be anybody else other than God who would send him the money. His faith in God was so strong that he believed that God had sent him the money.

Question 4: Who does Lencho think has taken the rest of the money? What is the irony in the situation? 

ANSWER: Lencho thought that the post office employees had taken the rest of the money. The irony of the situation was that the employees whom he called a “bunch of crooks” and suspected of taking some of the money were the same people who had contributed and sent him the money in the first place.

Question 1: Was Lencho surprised to find a letter for him with money in it?

ANSWER: No. Lencho was not at all surprised to see the letter from God with money inside it. His confidence and faith in God was such that he had expected that reply from God.

Question 2:What made him angry?

ANSWER: He got angry when he counted the money. There were only seventy pesos in the envelope. He was confident that God could neither make a mistake nor deny him what he had requested. Therefore, he concluded that the post office employees must have taken the remaining thirty pesos.

Page No 8:

Question 5: Are there people like Lencho in the real world? What kind of a person would you say he is? You may select appropriate words from the box to answer the question.
Greedy
Naïve
stupid
ungrateful
selfish
comical
unquestioning
ANSWER:
There might be a few people like Lencho in the real world. He is an unquestioning, naïve kind of a person.

Question 6: There are two kinds of conflict in the story: between humans and nature, and between humans themselves. How are these conflicts illustrated?

ANSWER: The conflict between humans and nature is illustrated by the destruction of Lencho’s crops by the hailstorm. Lencho had worked really hard on his fields and the harvest was really important for him. He required the money to feed his family. However, the nature turned violent. The rains were accompanied by a hailstorm, which destroyed the crops. The story also illustrates another conflict, between humans themselves. The postmaster, along with the help of the other post office employees, sent Lencho the money that they could manage to collect. They were not related to Lencho in any manner. It was an act of kindness and selflessness on their part. Even though they did a good deed, Lencho blamed them for taking away some amount of money. He called them “a bunch of crooks”. This shows that man does not have faith in his fellow humans, thereby giving rise to this conflict.

Question 1: There are different names in different parts of the world for storms, depending on their nature. Can you match the names in the box with their descriptions below, and fill in the blanks? You may use a dictionary to help you.
gale,
whirlwind,
cyclone,
hurricane,
tornado,
typhoon

1. A violent tropical storm in which strong winds move in a circle:

__ __ c __ __ __ __

2. An extremely strong wind: __ a __ __

3. A violent tropical storm with very strong winds: __ __ p __ __ __ __

4. A violent storm whose centre is a cloud in the shape of a funnel:

__ __ __ n __ __ __

5. A violent storm with very strong winds, especially in the western Atlantic ocean: __ __ r __ __ __ __ __ __

6. A very strong wind that moves very fast in a spinning movement and causes a lot of damage: __ __ __ __ l __ __ __ __

ANSWER:
1. Cyclone

2. Gale

3. Typhoon

4. Tornado

5. Hurricane

6. Whirlwind


Page No 9:
Question 3: Relative Clauses

Join the sentences given below using who, whom, whose, which as suggested.
1. I often go to Mumbai. Mumbai is the commercial capital of India. (which)

2. My mother is going to host a TV show on cooking. She cooks very well. (who)

3. These sportspersons are going to meet the President. Their performance has been excellent. (whose)

4. Lencho prayed to God. His eyes see into our minds. (whose)

5. This man cheated me. I trusted him. (whom)

ANSWER:
1. I often go to Mumbai, which is the commercial capital of India.

2. My mother, who cooks very well, is going to host a TV show on cooking.

3. These sportspersons, whose performance has been excellent, are going to meet the President.

4. Lencho prayed to God, whose eyes see into our minds.

5. This man, whom I trusted, cheated me.



Page No 10:
Question 4:
Find sentences in the story with negative words, which express the following ideas emphatically.

1. The trees lost all their leaves.

_______________________________________________________________

2. The letter was addressed to God himself.

_______________________________________________________________

3. The postman saw this address for the first time in his career.

_______________________________________________________________

ANSWER:
1. The trees lost all their leaves.

Not a leaf remained on the trees.

2. The letter was addressed to God himself.

It was nothing less than a letter to God.

3. The postman saw this address for the first time in his career.

Never in his career as a postman had he known that address.

February 09, 2021

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Hindi Sparsh Chapter 10 बड़े भाई साह

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 
Hindi Sparsh Chapter 10 

बड़े भाई साहब

पाठ्यपुस्तक के प्रश्न-अभ्यास

मौखिक

निम्नलिखित प्रश्नों के उत्तर एक-दो पंक्तियों में दीजिए

प्रश्न 1. कथा नायक की रुचि किन कार्यों में थी?
उत्तर- कथा नायक की रुचि खेल-कूद, मैदानों की सुखद हरियाली, हवा के हलके-हलके झोंके, फुटबॉल की उछल-कूद, बॉलीबॉल की फुरती और पतंगबाजी, कागज़ की तितलियाँ उड़ाना, चारदीवारी पर चढ़कर नीचे कूदना, फाटक पर सवार होकर उसे आगे-पीछे चलाना आदि कार्यों में थी। 

प्रश्न 2. बड़े भाई साहब छोटे भाई से हर समय पहला सवाल क्या पूछते थे?
उत्तर- बड़े भाई छोटे भाई से हर समय एक ही सवाल पूछते थे-कहाँ थे? उसके बाद वे उसे उपदेश देने लगते थे।

प्रश्न 3. दूसरी बार पास होने पर छोटे भाई के व्यवहार में क्या परिवर्तन आया?
उत्तर- दूसरी बार पास होने पर छोटे भाई के व्यवहार में यह परिवर्तन आया कि वह स्वच्छंद और घमंडी हो गया। वह यह । सोचने लगा कि अब पढ़े या न पढ़े, वह पास तो हो ही जाएगा। वह बड़े भाई की सहनशीलता का अनुचित लाभ उठाकर अपना अधिक समय खेलकूद में लगाने लगा।

प्रश्न 4. बड़े भाई साहब छोटे भाई से उम्र में कितने बड़े थे और वे कौन-सी कक्षा में पढ़ते थे?
उत्तर- बड़े भाई साहब लेखक से उम्र में 5 साल बड़े थे। वे नवीं कक्षा में पढ़ते थे।

प्रश्न 5.बड़े भाई साहब दिमाग को आराम देने के लिए क्या करते थे?
उत्तर- बड़े भाई साहब दिमाग को आराम देने के लिए कभी कापी पर वे कभी किताब के हाशियों पर चिड़ियों, कुत्तों, बिल्लियों के चित्र बनाते थे। कभी-कभी वे एक शब्द या वाक्य को अनेक बार लिख डालते, कभी एक शेर-शायरी की बार-बार सुंदर अक्षरों में नकल करते। कभी ऐसी शब्द रचना करते, जो निरर्थक होती, कभी किसी आदमी को चेहरा बनाते।

लिखित

(क) निम्नलिखित प्रश्नों के उत्तर ( 25-30 शब्दों में) लिखिए-

प्रश्न 1. छोटे भाई ने अपनी पढ़ाई का टाइम-टेबिल बनाते समय क्या-क्या सोचा और फिर उसका पालन क्यों नहीं कर पाया?
उत्तर- छोटे भाई ने अधिक मन लगाकर पढ़ने का निश्चय कर टाइम-टेबिल बनाया, जिसमें खेलकूद के लिए कोई स्थान नहीं था। पढ़ाई का टाइम-टेबिल बनाते समय उसने यह सोचा कि टाइम-टेबिल बना लेना एक बात है और बनाए गए टाइम-टेबिल पर अमल करना दूसरी बात है। यह टाइम-टेबिल का पालन न कर पाया, क्योंकि मैदान की हरियाली, फुटबॉल की उछल-कूद, बॉलीबॉल की तेज़ी और फुरती उसे अज्ञात और अनिवार्य रूप से खींच ले जाती और वहाँ जाते ही वह सब कुछ भूल जाता।

प्रश्न 2. एक दिन जब गुल्ली-डंडा खेलने के बाद छोटा भाई बड़े भाई साहब के सामने पहुँचा तो उनकी क्या प्रतिक्रिया हुई ?
उत्तर- छोटा भाई दिनभर गुल्ली-डंडा खेलकर बड़े भाई के सामने पहुँचा तो बड़े भाई ने गुस्से में उसे खूब लताड़ा। उसे घमंडी कहा और सर्वनाश होने का डर दिखाया। उसने उसकी सफलता को भी तुक्का बताया और आगे की पढ़ाई का भय दिखलाया।

प्रश्न 3.बड़े भाई साहब को अपने मन की इच्छाएँ क्यों दबानी पड़ती थीं?
उत्तर-बड़े भाई साहब बड़े होने के नाते यही चाहते और कोशिश करते थे कि वे जो कुछ भी करें, वह छोटे भाई के लिए एक उदाहरण का काम करे। उन्हें अपने नैतिक कर्तव्य का वोध था कि स्वयं अनुशासित रह कर ही वे भाई को अनुशासन में रख पाएँगे। इस आदर्श तथा गरिमामयी स्थिति को बनाए रखने के लिए उन्हें अपने मन की इच्छाएँ दबानी पड़ती थीं।
 
प्रश्न 4. बड़े भाई साहब छोटे भाई को क्या सलाह देते थे और क्यों ?
उत्तर-बड़े भाई साहब छोटे भाई को दिन-रात पढ़ने तथा खेल-कूद में समय न गॅवाने की सलाह देते थे। वे बड़ा होने के कारण उसे राह पर चलाना अपना कर्तव्य समझते थे।

प्रश्न 5. छोटे भाई ने बड़े भाई साहब के नरम व्यवहार का क्या फ़ायदा उठाया?
उत्तर- छोटे भाई (लेखक) ने बड़े भाई साहब के नरम व्यवहार का अनुचित फ़ायदा उठाया, जिससे उसकी स्वच्छंदता बढ़ गई और उसने पढ़ना-लिखना बंद कर दिया। उसके मन में यह भावना बलवती हो गई कि वह पढ़े या न पढ़े परीक्षा में पास अवश्य हो जाएगा। इतना ही नहीं, उसने अपना सारा समय पतंगबाज़ी को ही भेंट कर दिया।

(ख) निम्नलिखित प्रश्नों के उत्तर (50-60 शब्दों में) लिखिए-

प्रश्न 1. बड़े भाई की डाँट-फटकार अगर न मिलती, तो क्या छोटा भाई कक्षा में अव्वल आता? अपने विचार प्रकट कीजिए।
उत्तर- मेरे विचार में यह सच है कि अगर बड़े भाई की डाँट-फटकार छोटे भाई को न मिलती, तो वह कक्षा में कभी भी अव्वल नहीं आता। यद्यपि उसने बड़े भाई की नसीहत तथा लताड़ से कभी कोई सीख ग्रहण नहीं की, परंतु उसपर अप्रत्यक्ष रूप से प्रभाव गहरा पड़ता था, क्योंकि छोटा भाई तो खे-प्रवृत्ति का था। बड़े भाई की डाँट-फटकार की ही भूमिका ने उसे कक्षा में प्रथम आने में सहायता की तथा उसकी चंचलता पर नियंत्रण रखा। मेरे विचार से बड़े भाई की डाँट-फटकार के कारण ही छोटा भाई कक्षा में अव्वल अता था अर्थात् बड़े भाई की डाँट-फटकार उसके लिए वरदान सिद्ध हुई।

प्रश्न 2. इस पाठ में लेखक ने समूची शिक्षा के किन तौर-तरीकों पर व्यंग्य किया है? क्या आप उनके विचार से सहमत हैं?
उत्तर- एक दिन जब गुल्ली-डंडा खेलने के बाद छोटा भाई बड़े भाई साहब के सामने पहुँचा तो उन्होंने रौद्र रूप धारण कर पूछा, “कहाँ थे? लेखक को मौन देखकर उन्होंने लताड़ते हुए घमंड पैदा होने तथा आगामी परीक्षा में फेल होने का भय दिखाया।

प्रश्न 3. बड़े भाई साहब के अनुसार जीवन की समझ कैसे आती है?
उत्तर- बड़े भाई साहब के अनुसार जीवन की समझ अनुभव रूपी ज्ञान से आती है, जोकि जीवन के लिए अत्यंत महत्त्वपूर्ण है। उनके अनुसार पुस्तकीय ज्ञान से हर कक्षा पास करके अगली कक्षा में प्रवेश मिलता है, लेकिन यह पुस्तकीय ज्ञान अनुभव में उतारे बिना अधूरा है। दुनिया को देखने, परखने तथा बुजुर्गों के जीवन से हमें अनुभव रूपी ज्ञान को प्राप्त करना आवश्यक है, क्योंकि यह ज्ञान हर विपरीत परिस्थिति में भी समस्या का समाधान करने से सहायक होता है। इसलिए उनके अनुसार अनुभव पढ़ाई से ज़्यादा महत्त्वपूर्ण है, जिससे जीवन को परखा और सँवारा जाता है तथा जीवन को समझने की समझ आती है।

प्रश्न 4. छोटे भाई के मन में बड़े भाई साहब के प्रति श्रद्धा क्यों उत्पन्न हुई?
उत्तर- बड़े भाई साहब छोटे भाई को-खेलकूद में समय न गॅवाकर पढ़ने की सलाह देते थे।
अभिमान न करने की सीख देते थे। अपनी बात मानने की सलाह देते थे। वे बड़ा होने के कारण ऐसा करना अपना कर्तव्य समझते थे।

प्रश्न 5. बड़े भाई की स्वभावगत विशेषताएँ बताइए?
उत्तर- बड़े भाई की स्वभावगत विशेषताएँ निम्नलिखित हैं-
बड़ा भाई बड़ा ही परिश्रमी था। वह दिन-रात पढ़ाई में ही जुटा रहता था इसलिए खेल-कूद, क्रिकेट मैच आदि में उसकी कोई रुचि नहीं थी।वह बार-बार फेल होने के बावजूद पढ़ाई में लीन रहता था। बड़ा भाई उपदेश की कला में बहुत माहिर है इसलिए वह अपने छोटे भाई को उपदेश ही देता रहता है, क्योंकि वह अपने छोटे भाई को एक नेक इंसान बनाना चाहता है। वह अनुशासनप्रिय है, सिद्धांतप्रिय है, आत्मनियंत्रण करना जानता है। वह आदर्शवादी बनकर छोटे भाई के सामने एक उदाहरण प्रस्तुत करना चाहता है।
बड़ा भाई अपने छोटे भाई से पाँच साल बड़ा है इसलिए वह अपने अनुभव रूपी ज्ञान को छोटे भाई को भी देता है।

प्रश्न 6.बड़े भाई साहब ने जिंदगी के अनुभव और किताबी ज्ञान में से किसे और क्यों महत्त्वपूर्ण कहा है?
उत्तर- बड़े भाई साहब ने जिंदगी के अनुभव और किताबी ज्ञान में से जिंदगी के अनुभव को अधिक महत्त्वपूर्ण माना है। उनका मत था कि किताबी ज्ञान तो रट्टा मारने का नाम है। उसमें ऐसी-ऐसी बातें हैं जिनका जीवन से कुछ लेना-देना नहीं। इससे बुधि का विकास और जीवन की सही समझ विकसित नहीं हो पाती है। इसके विपरीत अनुभव से जीवन की सही समझ विकसित होती है। इसी अनुभव से जीवन के सुख-दुख से सरलता से पार पाया जाता है। घर का खर्च चलाना हो घर के प्रबंध करने हो या बीमारी का संकट हो, वहीं उम्र और अनुभव ही इनमें व्यक्ति की मदद करते हैं।

प्रश्न 7. बताइए पाठ के किन अंशों से पता चलता है कि- छोटा भाई अपने भाई साहब का आदर करता है। भाई साहब को जिंदगी का अच्छा अनुभव है। भाई साहब के भीतर भी एक बच्चा है। भाई साहब छोटे भाई का भला चाहते हैं।
उत्तर-
1. छोटे भाई का मानना है कि बड़े भाई को उसे डाँटने-डपटने का पूरा अधिकार है क्योंकि वे उससे बड़े हैं। छोटे भाई की शालीनता व सभ्यता इसी में थी कि वह उनके आदेश को कानून की तरह माने अर्थात् पूरी सावधानी व सर्तकता से उनकी बात का पालन करे।

2. भाई साहब ने छोटे भाई से कहा कि मुझे जीवन का तुमसे अधिक अनुभव है। समझ किताबी ज्ञान से नहीं आती अपितु दुनिया के अनुभव से आती है। जिस प्रकार अम्मा व दादा पढ़े लिखे नहीं है, फिर भी उन्हें संसार का अनुभव हम से अधिक है। बड़े भाई ने कहा कि यदि मैं आज अस्वस्थ हो जाऊँ, तो तुम भली प्रकार मेरी देख-रेख नहीं कर सकते। यदि दादा हों, तो वे स्थिति को सँभाल लेंगे। तुम अपने हेडमास्टर को देखो, उनके पास अनेक डिग्रियाँ हैं। उनके घर का इंतजाम उनकी बूढ़ी माँ करती हैं। इन सब उदाहरणों से स्पष्ट है कि भाई साहब को जिंदगी का अच्छा अनुभव था।

3. भाई साहब ने छोटे भाई से कहा कि मैं तुमको पतंग उड़ान की मनाहीं नहीं करता। सच तो यह कि पतंग उड़ाने की मेरी भी इच्छा होती है। बड़े भाई साहब बड़े होने के नाते अपनी भावनाओं को दवा जाते हैं। एक दिन भाई साहब के ऊपर से पतंग गुजरी, भाई साहब ने अपनी लंबाई का लाभ उठाया। वे उछलकर पतंग की डोर पकड़कर हॉस्टल की ओर दौड़कर आ रहे थे, छोटा भाई भी उनके पीछे-पीछे दौड़ रहा था। इन सभी बातों से यह सिद्ध होता है कि बड़े भाई साहब के भीतर भी एक बच्चा है, जो अनुकूल वातावरण पाकर उभर उठता है।

4. बड़े भाई साहब द्वारा छोटे भाई को यह समझाना कि किताबी ज्ञान होना एक बात है और जीवन का अनुभव दूसरी बात। तुम पढ़ाई में परीक्षा पास करके मेरे पास आ गए हो, लेकिन यह याद रखो कि मैं तुमसे बड़ा हूँ और तुम मुझसे छोटे हो। मैं तुम्हें गलत रास्ते पर रखने के लिए थप्पड़ का डर दिखा सकता हूँ या थप्पड़ मार भी सकता हूँ अर्थात् तुम्हें डाँटने का हक मुझे है।

(ग) निम्नलिखित के आशय स्पष्ट कीजिए-

प्रश्न 1. इम्तिहान पास कर लेना कोई चीज नहीं, असल चीज़ है बुद्धि का विकास।
उत्तर- इस पंक्ति का आशय है कि इम्तिहान में पास हो जाना कोई बड़ी बात नहीं है, क्योंकि इम्तिहान तो रटकर भी पास किया जा सकता है। केवल इम्तिहान पास करने से जीवन का अनुभव प्राप्त नहीं होता और बिना अनुभव के बुधि का विकास नहीं होता। वास्तविक ज्ञान तो बुधि का विकास है, जिससे व्यक्ति जीवन को सार्थक बना सकता है।

प्रश्न 2. फिर भी जैसे मौत और विपत्ति के बीच भी आदमी मोह और माया के बंधन में जकड़ा रहता है, मैं फटकार घुड़कियाँ खाकर भी खेलकूद का तिरस्कार न कर सकता था।
उत्तर- लेखक खेल-कूद, सैर-सपाटे और मटरगश्ती का बड़ा प्रेमी था। उसका बड़ा भाई इन सब बातों के लिए उसे खूब डाँटता-डपटता था। उसे घुड़कियाँ देता था, तिरस्कार करता था। परंतु फिर भी वह खेल-कूद को नहीं छोड़ सकता था। वह खेलों पर जान छिड़कता था। जिस प्रकार विविध संकटों में फँसकर भी मनुष्य मोहमाया में बँधा रहता है, उसी प्रकार लेखक डाँट-फटकार सहकर भी खेल-कूद के आकर्षण से बँधा रहता था।

प्रश्न 3. बुनियाद ही पुख्ता न हो, तो मकान कैसे पायेदार बने ?
उत्तर- इस पंक्ति का आशय है कि जिस प्रकार मकान को मजबूत तथा टिकाऊ बनाने के लिए उसकी नींव को गहरा तथा ठोस बनाया जाता है, ठीक उसी प्रकार से जीवन की नींव को मजबूत बनाने के लिए शिक्षा रूपी भवन की नींव भी बहुत मज़बूत होनी चाहिए, क्योंकि इसके बिना जीवन रूपी मकान पायदार नहीं बन सकता।

प्रश्न 4. आँखें आसमान की ओर थीं और मन उस आकाशगामी पथिक की ओर, जो बंद राति से आ रहा था, मानो कोई आत्मा स्वर्ग से निकलकर विरक्त मन से नए संस्करण ग्रहण करने जा रही हो।
उत्तर- लेखक पतंग लूटने के लिए आकाश की ओर देखता हुआ दौड़ा जा रहा था। उसकी आँखें आकाश में उड़ने वाली पतंग रूपी यात्री की ओर थीं। अर्थात् उसे पतंग आकाश में उड़ने वाली दिव्य आत्मा जैसी मनोरम प्रतीत हो रही थी। वह आत्मा मानो मंद गति से झूमती हुई नीचे की ओर आ रही थी। आशय यह है कि कटी हुई पतंग धीरे-धीरे धरती की ओर गिर रही थी। लेखक को कटी पतंग इतनी अच्छी लग रही थी मानो वह कोई आत्मा हो जो स्वर्ग से मिल कर आई हो और बड़े भारी मन से किसी दूसरे के हाथों में आने के लिए धरती पर उतर रही हो।

भाषा अध्ययन

प्रश्न 1. निम्नलिखित शब्दों के दो-दो पर्यायवाची शब्द लिखिए-
नसीहत, रोष, आज़ादी, राजा, ताज्जुब
उत्तर
शब्द – पर्यायवाच
नसीहत – शिक्षा, सीख, उपदेश, सबक
रोष – क्रोध, गुस्सा, क्षोभ
आज़ादी – स्वतंत्रता, स्वच्छंदता, स्वाधीनता, मुक्ति
राजा – नृप, महीप, नरेश, प्रजापालके
ताज्जुब – आश्चर्य, विस्मय, हैरानी

प्रश्न 2. प्रेमचंद की भाषा बहुत पैनी और मुहावरेदार है। इसीलिए इनकी कहानियाँ रोचक और प्रभावपूर्ण होती हैं। इस कहानी में आप देखेंगे कि हर अनुच्छेद में दो-तीन मुहावरों का प्रयोग किया गया है। उदाहरणतः इन वाक्यों को देखिए और ध्यान से पढ़िए-

मेरो जी पढ़ने में बिलकुल न लगता था। एक घंटा भी किताब लेकर बैठना पहाड़ था।
भाई साहब उपदेश की कला में निपुण थे। ऐसी-ऐसी लगती बातें कहते, ऐसे-ऐसे सूक्ति बाण चलाते कि मेरे जिगर के टुकड़े-टुकड़े हो जाते और हिम्मत टूट जाती। बड़े भाई साहब
वह जानलेवा टाइम-टेबिल, वह आँखफोड़ पुस्तकें, किसी की याद न रहती और भाई साहब को नसीहत और फजीहत का अवसर मिल जाता।

प्रश्न 3. क्रियाएँ मुख्यतः दो प्रकार की होती हैं-सकर्मक और अकर्मक
सकर्मक क्रिया- वाक्य में जिस क्रिया के प्रयोग में कर्म की अपेक्षा रहती है, उसे सकर्मक क्रिया कहते हैं;
जैसे- शीला ने सेब खाया।
मोहन पानी पी रहा है।
अकर्मक क्रिया- वाक्य में जिस क्रिया के प्रयोग में कर्म की अपेक्षा नहीं होती, उसे अकर्मक क्रिया कहते हैं;
जैसे- शीला हँसती है।
बच्चा रो रहा है।

प्रश्न 4. नीचे दिए वाक्यों में कौन-सी क्रिया है- सकर्मक या अकर्मक? लिखिए-

उन्होंने वहीं हाथ पकड़ लिया।
फिर चोरों-सी जीवन कटने लगा।
शैतान का हाल भी पढ़ा ही होगा।
मैं यह लताड़ सुनकर आँसू बहाने लगता।
समय की पाबंदी पर एक निबंध लिखो।
मैं पीछे-पीछे दौड़ रहा था।
उत्तर-

सकर्मक
सकर्मक
सकर्मक
सकर्मक
सकर्मक
अकर्मक

प्रश्न 5. ‘इक’ प्रत्यय लगाकर शब्द बनाइए-
विचार, इतिहास, संसार, दिन, नीति, प्रयोग, अधिकार
उत्तर-
विचार – वैचारिक
नीति – नैतिक
इतिहास – ऐतिहासिक
प्रयोग – प्रायोगिक
संसार – सांसारिक
अधिकार – आधिकारिक
दिन – दैनिक

अन्य  प्रश्न

लघु उत्तरीय प्रश्नोत्तर

प्रश्न 1. लेखक अपने बड़े भाई के हुक को कानून समझने में शालीनता समझता था, ऐसा क्यों ? स्पष्ट कीजिए।
उत्तर- लेखक और उसके भाई साहब छात्रावास में रहकर पढ़ाई करते थे। लेखक अपने बड़े भाई से उम्र में पाँच वर्ष छोटा था। वह नौ साल का और भाई साहब चौदह वर्ष के। उम्र और अनुभव के इस अंतर के कारण उन्हें लेखक की देखभाल और डाँट-डपट का पूरा अधिकार था और उनकी बातें मानने में ही लेखक की शालीनता थी।

प्रश्न 2. बड़े भाई महत्त्व की विधियाँ देखकर लेखक किस पहेली का हल नहीं निकाल सका और क्यों?
उत्तर- लेखक ने देखा कि बड़े भाई साहब ने अपनी पुस्तकों और कापियों के पृष्ठों और हासिये पर जानवरों की तसवीरें बना रखी हैं या ऐसे-ऐसे शब्दों का निरर्थक मेल करने का प्रयास किया है जिनसे किसी अर्थ की अभिव्यक्ति नहीं होती है। लाख चेष्टा करने पर कुछ समझ न पाने के कारण लेखक के लिए यह अबूझ पहेली बनी रही। वह उम्र में छोटा होने से बड़े भाई की पहेलियों का हल कैसे ढूँढ़ सकता था।

प्रश्न 3. शिक्षा जैसे महत्त्वपूण मसले पर बड़े भाई साहब के विचारों को स्पष्ट कीजिए।
उत्तर- भाई साहब शिक्षा को जीवन के लिए अत्यंत महत्त्वपूर्ण मानते थे। ऐसे महत्त्वपूर्ण मामलों में वे जल्दबाजी करने के पक्षधर न थे। उनका मानना था कि जिस प्रकार एक मजबूत मकान बनाने के लिए मजबूत नींव की जरूरत होती है उसी प्रकार शिक्षा की नींव मजबूत बनाने के लिए वे एक-एक कक्षा में दो-दो, तीन साल लगाते थे।

प्रश्न 4. लेखक को अपने वार्ड के रौद्र रूप के दर्शन क्यों हो जाया करते थे?
उत्तर- लेखक का मन पढ़ाई के बजाए खेलकूद में अधिक लगता था। वह घंटा भर भी पढ़ाई के लिए न बैठता और मौका पाते ही होस्टल से निकलकर मैदान में आ जाता। वह तरह-तरह के खेल खेलते हुए, दोस्तों के साथ बातें करते हुए समय। बिताया करता था। उसका ऐसा करना और पढ़ाई से दूरी भाई साहब को पसंद न था। वह जब भी खेलकर घर आता, तब उसे उनके रौद्र रूप के दर्शन हो जाया करते थे।

प्रश्न 5. खेल में लौटे भाई साब लेखक का साइत किस तरह करते थे?
उत्तर- लेखक जब भी खेलकर घर लौटता तो गुस्साए भाई साहब उससे पहला सवाल यही करते, “कहाँ थे”? हर बार इसी प्रकार के प्रश्न का उत्तर लेखक भी चुप रहकर दिया था। वह अपने द्वारा बाहर खेलने की बात कह नहीं पाता। लेखक की यह चुप्पी कहती थी कि उसे अपना अपराध स्वीकार है। ऐसे में भाई साहब स्नेह और रोष भरे शब्दों में उसका स्वागत करते।

प्रश्न 6. अंग्रेजी विषय के बारे में भाई व लेखक को क्या बताते थे? ऐसा कहने के पीछे भाई साहब का उद्देश्य क्या था
उत्तर- बड़े भाई साहब लेखक के सामने अंग्रेजी की कठिनता का भयावह चित्र खींचते हुए कहते, ”इस तरह अंग्रेज़ी पढ़ोगे तो जिंदगी भर पढ़ते रहोगे और एक हर्फ़ न आएगा। अंग्रेजी पढ़ना कोई हँसी-खेल नहीं है, जिसे हर कोई पढ़ ले। इसके लिए दिन-रात एक करना पड़ता है। इतने परिश्रम के बाद भी इसे शुद्ध रूप से पढ़ा और बोला नहीं जा सकता।” ऐसा कहने के पीछे भाई साहब का उद्देश्य यही था कि लेखक अधिकाधिक पढ़ाई पर ध्यान दे।

प्रश्न 7. ‘मुझे देखकर भी सबक नहीं लेते’-ऐसा कहकर भाई साहब लेखक को क्या बताना चाहते थे?
उत्तर- लेखक के बड़े भाई साहब पढ़ाई के नाम पर किताबें रटने का प्रयास करते वे रटकर परीक्षा पास करने का प्रयास करते। वे ऐसा करने के क्रम में अकसर किताबें खोले रहते और खेलकूद, मेले-तमाशे छोड़कर पढ़ते रहते थे, फिर भी परीक्षा में फेल हो गए। वे अपने उदाहरण द्वारा यह बताना चाहते थे कि यदि इतना पढ़कर भी मैं फेल हो गया तो तुम सोचो खेलने में समय गंवाने वाले तुम्हारा क्या हाल होगा।

प्रश्न 8. डाँट-फटकार लगाते भाई साहब लेखक को क्या-क्या सलाह दे डालते थे? उनके ऐसे व्यवहार को आप कितना उचित समझते हैं?
उत्तर- पढ़ाई छोड़कर खेलकूद में समय गंवाकर लौटे लेखक को भाई-साहब खूब डाँटते-फटकारते और यह सलाह भी दे देते कि जब मैं एक दरजे में दो-तीन साल लगाता हूँ तो तुम उम्र भर एक ही दरजे में पड़े सड़ते रहोगे। इससे बेहतर है कि तुम घर जाकर गुल्ली-डंडा खेलो और दादा की गाढ़ी कमाई के पैसे बरबाद न करो। उनके इस व्यवहार को मैं उचित नहीं मानता, क्योंकि उनके विचारों में नकारात्मकता झलकती है।

प्रश्न 9. भाई साहब द्वारा लताड़े जाने के बाद लेखक जो टाइम-टेबिल बनाता, उसका वर्णन कीजिए।
उत्तर- भाई साहब द्वारा लताड़े जाने के बाद लेखक जो टाइम-टेबिल बनाता था उसमें खेल के लिए जगह नहीं होती। इस टाइम-टेबिल में प्रातः छह से आठ तक अंग्रेज़ी, आठ से नौ तक हिसाब, साढ़े नौ तक भूगोल फिर भोजन और स्कूल के बाद चार से पाँच तक भूगोल, पाँच से छह तक ग्रामर, छह से सात तक अंग्रेजी कंपोजीशन आठ से नौ अनुवाद नौ से दस तक हिंदी और दस से ग्यारह विविध विषय, फिर विश्राम।

प्रश्न 10. लेखक अपने ही बनाए टाइम-टेबिल पर अमल क्यों नहीं कर पाता था?
उत्तर- लेखक का मन पढ़ाई से अधिक खेलकूद में लगता था। वह पढ़ने का निश्चय करके भले ही टाइम-टेबिल बना लेता पर इस टाइम-टेबिल पर अमल करने की जगह उसकी अवहेलना शुरू हो जाती। मैदान की सुखद हरियाली, हवा के झोंके, खेलकूद की मस्ती और उल्लास, कबड्डी के दाँव-पेंच और बॉलीबाल की फुरती उसे खींच ले जाती, ऐसे में उसे टाइम टेबिल और किताबों की याद नहीं रह जाती थी।

प्रश्न 11. बड़े भाई साहब ने लेखक का घमंड दूर करने के लिए क्या उपाय अपनाया?
उत्तर- बड़े भाई साहब ने देखा कि उनके फेल होने और खुद के पास होने से लेखक के मन में घमंड हो गया है। उसका घमंड दूर करने के लिए उसने रावण का उदाहरण देते हुए कहा कि रावण चक्रवर्ती राजा था, जिसे संसार के अन्य राजा कर देते थे। बड़े-बड़े देवता भी उसकी गुलामी करते थे। आग और पानी के देवता भी उसके दास थे पर घमंड ने उसका भी नाश कर दिया।

प्रश्न 12. परीक्षकों के संबंध में भाई साहब के विचार कैसे थे? स्पष्ट कीजिए।
उत्तर- परीक्षकों के संबंध में भाई साहब के विचार बहुत अच्छे नहीं थे। भाई साहब का कहना था कि परीक्षक इतने निर्दयी होते थे कि जामेट्री में अ ज ब लिखने की जगह अ ब ज लिखते ही अंक काटकर छात्रों का खून कर देते थे, वह भी इतनी सी व्यर्थ की बात के लिए। इन परीक्षकों को छात्रों पर दया नहीं आती थी।

प्रश्न 13. फेल होने पर भी भाई साहब किस आधार पर अपना बड़प्पन बनाए हुए थे?
उत्तर- वार्षिक परीक्षा में फेल होने के कारणों में भाई साहब परीक्षकों का दृष्टिकोण, विषयों की कठिनता और अपनी कक्षा की पढ़ाई की कठिनता का हवाला देकर लेखक को कह रहे थे कि लाख फेल हो गया हूँ, लेकिन तुमसे बड़ा हूँ, संसार का मुझे तुमसे ज्यादा अनुभव है। वे उम्र में बड़े और अधिक अनुभवी होने के आधार पर अपना बड़प्पन बनाए रखना चाहते

प्रश्न 14. भाई साहब ने अपने दरजे की पढ़ाई का जो चित्र खींचा था उसका लेखक पर क्या प्रभाव पड़ा?
उत्तर-भाई साहब ने अपने दरजे की पढ़ाई को अत्यंत कठिन बताते हुए उसका जो भयंकर चित्र खींचा था, उससे लेखक भयभीत हो गया। लेखक को इस बात के लिए खुद पर आश्चर्य हो रहा था कि वह स्कूल छोड़कर घर क्यों नहीं भागा। इतने के बाद भी उसकी खेलों में रुचि और पुस्तकों में अरुचि यथावत बनी रही। वह अब कक्षा में अपमानित होने से बचने के लिए अपने टस्क पूरे करने लगा।

प्रश्न 15. भाई साहब भी कनकौए उड़ाना चाहते थे पर किस भावना के कारण वे चाहकर भी ऐसा नहीं कर पा रहे थे?
उत्तर- भाई साहब के अंदर भी बचपना छिपा था। इस बचपने को वे बलपूर्वक दबाकर अपनी बालसुलभ इच्छाओं का गला घोटे जा रहे थे। वे खेलने-कूदने और पतंग उड़ाने जैसा कार्य करना चाहते थे, परंतु कर्तव्य और बड़प्पन की भावना के कारण वे ऐसा नहीं कर पा रहे थे। यदि वे स्वयं खेलकूद में लग जाते तो लेखक को पढ़ने के लिए कैसे प्रेरित करते।

दीर्घ उत्तरीय प्रश्नोत्तर

प्रश्न 1. भाई साहब के फेल होने और खुद के अव्वल आने पर लेखक के मन में क्या-क्या विचार आए?
उत्तर- वार्षिक परीक्षा का जब परिणाम आया तो दिन-रात किताबें खोलकर बैठे रहने वाले भाई साहब फेल हो गए और उनका छोटा भाई (लेखक) जिसका सारा समय खेलकूद को भेंट होता था और बहुत डाँट-डपट खाने के बाद थोड़ी-सी पढ़ाई कर लेता था, परीक्षा में अव्वल आ गया। लेखक जब भी बाहर से खेलकर आता तो भाई साहब रौद्र रूप धारण कर सूक्तिबाणों से उसका स्वागत करते और जी भरकर लताड़ते। अब उनके फेल होने पर लेखक के मन में यह विचार आया क्यों न वह भाई साहब को आड़े हाथों ले और पूछे कि कहाँ गई वह आपकी घोर तपस्या? मुझे देखिए, मजे से खेलता भी रहा और दरजे में अव्वल भी हूँ, पर भाई साहब की उदासी और दुख देखकर उनके घावों पर नमक छिड़कने की हिम्मत लेखक को न हुई।

प्रश्न 2. भाई साहब भले ही फेल होकर एक कक्षा में दो-तीन साल लगाते थे पर उनकी सहज बुधि बड़ी तेज़ थी। स्पष्ट कीजिए।
उत्तर- भाई साहब पढ़ाई के प्रति घोर परिश्रम करते थे, परंतु एक-एक कक्षा में दो-दो या तीन-तीन साल लगाते थे। इसके बाद भी उनकी सहज बुद्धि बड़ी तेज़ थी। भाई साहब के फेल होने और छोटे भाई के पास होने से उसमें अभिमान की भावना बलवती हो गई। वह आज़ादी से खेलकूद में शामिल होने लगा। वह भाई साहब को मौखिक जवाब तो नहीं दे सकता था पर उसके रंग-ढंग से यह जाहिर होने लगा कि छोटा भाई अब भाई साहब के प्रति वैसी अदब नहीं रखता जैसी वह पहले रखा करता था। भाई की सहज बुद्धि ने बिना कुछ कहे-सुने इसे भाँप लिया और एक दिन जब वह खेलकर लौटा तो भाई साहब ने उसे उपदेशात्मक भाषा में खूब खरी-खोटी सुनाई । इससे स्पष्ट होता है कि भाई साहब की सहज बुद्धि अत्यंत तीव्र थी।

प्रश्न 3. बड़े भाई साहब ने तत्कालीन शिक्षा प्रणाली की जिन कमियों की ओर संकेत करते हुए अपने फेल होने के लिए उसे उत्तरदायी ठहराने की कोशिश की है, उससे आप कितना सहमत हैं? अपने विचार लिखिए।
उत्तर- बड़े भाई साहब ने उस समय की शिक्षा प्रणाली में जिन कमियों की ओर संकेत किया है उनमें मुख्य हैं-एक ही परीक्षा द्वारा छात्रों का मूल्यांकन अर्थात् वार्षिक परीक्षा के परिणाम पर ही छात्रों का भविष्य निर्भर करता था। इस प्रणाली से रटने की प्रवृत्ति को बढ़ावा मिलता था। इसमें छात्रों के अन्य पहलुओं के मूल्यांकन की न तो व्यवस्था थी और न उन्हें महत्त्व दिया जाता था। इसके अलावा परीक्षकों का दृष्टिकोण भी कुछ ऐसा था कि वे छात्रों से उस तरह के उत्तर की अपेक्षा करते थे जैसा पुस्तक में लिखा है। किताब से उत्तर अलग होते ही शून्य अंक मिल जाते थे। यद्यपि इन कारणों से ही भाई साहब अपने फेल होने का दोष परीक्षा प्रणाली पर नहीं डाल सकते हैं। वे खुद भी तो समझकर पढ़ने के बजाय रटकर पढ़ते थे जो उनके फेल होने का कारण बनी। इस तरह भाई साहब के विचारों से मैं सहमत नहीं हूँ। पास होने के लिए उन्हें विषयों को समझकर पढ़ने की जरूरत होती है जो उन्होंने नहीं किया।

February 08, 2021

The Rise of Nationalism in Europe Class 10 CBSE History NCERT Solutions

The Rise of Nationalism in Europe CBSE History NCERT Solutions
Question 1(a)
Write a note on Guiseppe Mazzini.
Solution:

Giuseppe Mazzini (1807-1872) was an Italian politician, journalist and activist for the unification of Italy and spearheaded the Italian revolutionary movement. His efforts helped bring about the independent and unified Italy in place of several separate states, many dominated by foreign powers.
He also helped define the modern European movement for popular democracy in a republican state.
Mazzini was a fervent advocate of republicanism and envisioned a united, free and independent Italy.
Unlike his contemporary Garibaldi, who was also a republican, Mazzini never compromised his republican ideas and refused to swear an oath of allegiance to the House of Savoy.
Mazzini was the spiritual force of the Italian resurrection. He joined the Carbonari, a revolutionary organisation and was arrested in 1830. He was sent into exile in 1831 for attempting a revolution in Liguria. He subsequently founded two more underground societies, first – Young Italy in Marseilles and then Young Europe in Berne, whose members were like- minded young men from Poland, France, Italy and the German states.
Mazzini believed that God had intended nations to be the natural units of mankind. So Italy could not continue to be a patchwork of small states and kingdoms. It had to be forged into a single unified republic within a wider alliance of nations. This unification alone could be the basis of Italian liberty. Mazzini was in favour of a republic because he thought sovereignity resides essentially in the people and can only completely express itself in that form. Mazzini’s relentless opposition to monarchy and his vision of democratic republics frightened the conservatives. Metternich described him as ‘the most dangerous enemy of our social order’.
Young Italy’ attempted many insurrections but were unsuccessful. Mazzini failed in his objects because he himself lacked some of the qualities of practical leadership. He underestimated the strength of the opposition. But in spite of these drawbacks he is one of the chief makers of Italy. He was responsible for the growth of patriotism for a country that existed as yet only in the imagination.

Question 1(b)
Write a note on Count Camillo de Cavour.
Solution:

Cavour was a realist who practiced realistic politics. He allied with France when necessary and with France’s key enemy, Prussia, was necessary.
Cavour used international power to achieve his domestic goals.
He devoted himself to the liberation of northern Italy from Austrian domination. A brilliant and steadfast diplomat, he played a leading role in the unification of Italy.
He was distrustful of the reactionary politics in force throughout Europe, particularly their manifestation in the repressive rule of Austria over a large area of Italy.
He became Prime Minister of Piedmont in 1852. He reorganized its army and it achieved rapid growth in material prosperity. Through a tactful diplomatic alliance with France, Sardinia-Piedmont succeeded in defeating the Austrian forces in 1859.
Apart from regular troops, a large number of armed volunteers under the leadership of Giuseppe Garibaldi joined the fight. In 1860, they marched into South Italy and the Kingdom of Two Sicilies and with the support of the local peasants drove out the Spanish rulers. Thus, Cavour was ultimately successful in the unification of Italy under King Victor Emmanuel II. He, however, died on June 6, 1861, before the completion of the unification of Italy in 1870. Although Cavour was neither a revolutionary nor a democrat he played an important role in the unification of Italy.

Write a note on The Greek war of independence.
Solution:

The Greek war of independence, also known as the Greek Revolution was a successful war of~m dependence waged by the Greek revolutionaries between 1821 and 1832 against the Ottoman Empire. The Greeks were later assisted by the Russian Empire, Great Britain, France and several other European powers, while the Ottomans were aided by their vassals, Egypt, Algeria etc.
Events: Greece had been part of the Ottoman Empire since the 15th century. The growth of revolutionary nationalism in Europe sparked off a struggle for independence among st the Greeks which began in 1821.
The object of the struggle was to expel Turks from Europe and to establish old Greek eastern empire.
Nationalists in Greece were supported by other Greeks living in exile and many West European countries.
Poets and artists lauded Greece as the cradle of European civilisation. They mobilised public opinion to support its struggle against a Muslim empire. The English poet Lord Byron organised funds and later went to fight in the war.
Ultimately, the Treaty of Constantinople of 1832 recognised Greece as an independent nation. Its independence was guaranteed by Russia, England and France.
Question 1(d)
Write a note on Frankfurt parliament.
Solution:

Frankfurt Parliament (1848-49) was convened at Frankfurt on May 18, 1848 as a result of the liberal revolution that swept the German states early in 1848.
The parliament was called by a preliminary assembly of German liberals in March 1848 and its members were elected by the direct manhood suffrage. They represented the entire political spectrum and included the foremost German figures of that time.
Its purpose was to plan the unification of Germany.
The conflict among the traditionally separate German states, notably Austria and Prussia made progress difficult.
In March 1849 the parliament adopted a federal constitution of German states, excluding Austria, with a parliamentary government and a hereditary emperor. Frederick William IV of Prussia was chosen emperor but he refused to accept the crown from a popularly elected assembly and the entire scheme failed.
Most of the representatives withdrew and the remainder were dispersed. The parliament, therefore, accomplished nothing as troops were called and the assembly was forced to disband.
Question 2.
What steps did the French revolutionaries take to create a sense of collective identity among the French people?
Solution:
From the very beginning, the French revolutionaries introduced various measures and practices that could create a sense of collective identity amongst the French people. The ideas of la patrie (the fatherland) and le citoyen (the citizen) emphasized the notion of a united community enjoying equal rights under a constitution. A new French flag, the tricolour, was chosen to replace the former royal standard. The Estates General was elected by the body of active citizens and renamed the National Assembly. New hymns were composed, oaths taken and martyrs commemorated, all in the name of the nation. A centralised administrative system was put in place and it formulated uniform laws for all citizens within its territory. Internal customs duties and dues were abolished and a uniform system of weights and measures was adopted. Regional dialects were discouraged and French, as it was spoken and written in Paris, became the common language of the nation.

Question 3.
Who were Marianne and Germania? What was the importance of the way in which they were portrayed?
Solution:

In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, artists represented the country as if it were a person.
Nations were portrayed as female figures that sought to give the abstract idea of the nation a concrete form.
The female form that was chosen to personify the nation did not stand for any particular woman in a real life.
Thus, in France, she was christened Marianne, a popular Christian name, which underlined the idea of a people’s nation.
Her characteristics were drawn from those of liberty and the Republic – the red cap, the tricolour, the cockade.
Statues of Marianne were installed in public squares to remind the public of the national symbols of unity and to persuade them to identify with it.
Marianne images were marked on coins and stamps too.
Similarly, Germania became the allegory of the German nation. In visual representations, Germania wears a crown of oak leaves, because the German oak stands for heroism.
The importance of the way in which they were portrayed was to remind the public of their national symbols of unity and to persuade them to identify with them.

Question 4.
Briefly trace the process of German unification.
Solution:
Nationalist feelings were widespread among middle-class Germans, who in 1848 tried to unite the different regions of the German confederation into a nation-state governed by an elected parliament. This liberal initiative to nation-building was, however, repressed by the combined forces of the monarchy and the military, supported by the large landowners (called Junkers) of Prussia. From then on, Prussia took on the leadership of the movement for national unification. Its chief minister, Otto von Bismarck, was the architect of this process carried out with the help of the Prussian army and bureaucracy. Three wars over seven years – with Austria, Denmark and France – ended in Prussian victory and completed the process of unification. In January 1871, the Prussian king, William I, was proclaimed German Emperor in a ceremony held at Versailles.

Question 5.
What changes did Napoleon introduce to make the administrative system more efficient in the territories ruled by him?
Solution:
The following changes were introduced by Napoleon to make the administrative system more efficient in the territories ruled by him :

Civil Code of 1804 or the Napoleonic Code was issued. It abolished all privileges based on birth. It established equality before the law and secured the right to property.
Napoleon simplified administrative divisions in the Dutch Republic, in Switzerland, in
Italy and Germany. ,
The feudal system was abolished and peasants were freed from serfdom and manorial dues.
Guild restrictions were removed in towns.
Improvements were made in the transport and communication systems.
Uniform laws, standardized weights, and measures, and a common national currency was introduced. It facilitated the movement and exchange of goods and capital from one region to another. In view of the above reforms it is stated that through a return to monarchy, Napoleon had, no doubt, destroyed democracy in France, but in the administrative field, he had incorporated revolutionary principles in order to make the whole system more rational and efficient.
Discuss

Question 1.
Explain what is meant by the 1848 revolution of the liberals. What were the political, social and economic ideas supported by the liberals?
Solution:
Since the French Revolution, liberalism had stood for the end of autocracy and clerical privileges, a constitution and representative government through parliament. Nineteenth-century liberals also stressed the inviolability of private property. The memory of the French Revolution nonetheless continued to inspire liberals. One of the major issues taken up by the liberal-nationalists, who criticised the new conservative order, was freedom of the press.

Parallel to the revolts of the poor, unemployed and starving peasants and workers in many European countries in the year 1848, a revolution led by the educated middle classes was under way. Events of February 1848 in France had brought about the abdication of the monarch and a republic based on universal male suffrage had been proclaimed. In other parts of Europe where independent nation-states did not yet exist – such as Germany, Italy, Poland, the Austro-Hungarian Empire – men and women of the liberal middle classes combined their demands for constitutionalism with national unification. They took advantage of the growing popular unrest to push their demands for the creation of a nation-state on parliamentary principles – a constitution, freedom of the press and freedom of association.

Question 2.
How was the history of nationalism in Britain unlike the rest of Europe?
Solution:
In Britain, the formation of the nation-state was not the result of a sudden upheaval or revolution. It was the result of a long-drawn-out process. There was no British nation prior to the eighteenth century. The primary identities of the people who inhabited the British Isles were ethnic ones – such as English, Welsh, Scot or Irish. All of these ethnic groups had their own cultural and political traditions. But as the English nation steadily grew in wealth, importance and power, it was able to extend its influence over the other nations of the islands. The English parliament, which had seized power from the monarchy in 1688 at the end of a protracted conflict, was the instrument through which a nation-state, with England at its centre, came to be forged.


 
The Act of Union (1707) between England and Scotland that resulted in the formation of the ‘United Kingdom of Great Britain’ meant, in effect, that England was able to impose its influence on Scotland. The British parliament was henceforth dominated by its English members. The growth of a British identity meant that Scotland’s distinctive culture and political institutions were systematically suppressed. The Catholic clans that inhabited the Scottish Highlands suffered terrible repression whenever they attempted to assert their independence. The Scottish Highlanders were forbidden to speak their Gaelic language or wear their national dress, and large numbers were forcibly driven out of their homeland


 
Question-11
Why did nationalist tensions emerge in the Balkans?
Solution:
The most serious source of nationalist tension in Europe after 1871 was the area called the Balkans. The Balkans was a region of geographical and ethnic variation comprising modern-day Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Greece, Macedonia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Slovenia, Serbia and Montenegro whose inhabitants were broadly known as the Slavs. A large part of the Balkans was under the control of the Ottoman Empire. The spread of the ideas of romantic nationalism in the Balkans together with the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire made this region very explosive.

All through the nineteenth century the Ottoman Empire had sought to strengthen itself through modernisation and internal reforms but with very little success. One by one, its European subject nationalities broke away from its control and declared independence. The Balkan peoples based their claims for independence or political rights on nationality and used history to prove that they had once been independent but had subsequently been subjugated by foreign powers. Hence the rebellious nationalities in the Balkans thought of their struggles as attempts to win back their long-lost independence. 


Multiple Choice Questions (Answers are written above)

1. Who, among the following, hosted the Congress at Vienna in 1815. [AI 2012]
(a) King of the Netherlands
(b) Giuseppe Mazzini
(c) Duke Metternich
(d) Otto von Bismarck

2. Which one of the following is true about the ‘Treaty of Constantinople’ in 1832. [AI 2012]
(a) It recognised Turkey as an independent nation.
(b) It recognised Greece as an independent nation.
(c) It recognised Germany as an independent nation.
(d) It recognised France as an independent nation.

 
3. Who among the following formed the secret society called ‘Young Italy’. [Delhi 2012]
(a) Otto von Bismarck
(b) Giuseppe Mazzini
(c) Metternich
(d) Johann Gottfried Herder
Or
Who among the following took power in the Southern part of Vietnam after the division of the country? [Delhi 2012]
(a) Ngo Dinh Diem
(b) Ho Chi Minh
(c) Bao Dai
(d) NLF

4. Which one of the following types of government was functioning in France before the revolution of 1789?
(a) Dictatorship
(b) Military
(c) Body of French Citizen
(d) Monarchy
Or
Who among the following was known as ‘Colons’ [Delhi 2012]
(a) French citizens living in Vietnam
(b) French citizens living in France
(c) Educated people of Vietnam
(d) Elites of Vietnam

 
5. Which one of the following statements is false regarding the Act of Union 1707? [Delhi 2011]
(a) It was an agreement between England and Scotland.
(b) It was an agreement between England and Ireland.
(c) It resulted in the formation of the ‘United Kingdom of Great Britain’.
(d) It gave England control over Scotland.

6. Which one of the following states was ruled by an Italian princely house before the unification of Italy? [AI 2011]
(a) Kingdom of Two Sicilies
(b) Lombardy
(c) Venetia
(d) Sardinia-Piedmont

7. Which one of the following statements is not true about Giuseppe Mazzini? [Foreign 2011]
(a) He wanted the united Italian Republic.
(b) He founded an underground society called ‘Young Italy’.
(c) He wanted Italy to be a monarchy.
(d) He was exiled for attempting a revolution in Liguria.

8. Who said, “when France sneezes the rest of Europe catches cold”?
(a) Garibaldi
(b) Mazzini
(c) Metternich
(d) Bismarck

9. Which treaty recognised Greece as an independent nation?
(a) Treaty of Versailles
(b) Treaty of Vienna
(c) Treaty of Constantinople
(d) Treaty of Lausanne

10. Who was responsible *for the Unification of Germany?
(a) Bismarck
(b) Cavour
(c) Mazzini
(d) Garibaldi

11. Which area was known as the powder keg of Europe?
(a) Germany
(b) Italy
(c) Balkans
(d) Ottoman Empire

12. Elle, the measuring unit in Germany was used to measure
(a) cloth
(b) thread
(c) land
(d) height

13. Zolleverin started in 1834 in Prussia refers to a
(a) Trade Union
(b) Customs Union
(c) Labour Union
(d) Farmer’s Union

14. The Ottoman Empire was ruled by the emperor of
(a) Turkey
(b) Russia
(c) Britain
(d) Prussia

15. At which of the following places was the Frankfurt Assembly convened
(a) at the church of St. Paul.
(b) at the church of St. Peters.
(c) at the palace of Prussia.
(d) at the Hall of Mirrors in the Palace of Versailles.

16. What did the crown of oak leaves symbolise?
(a) Courage
(b) Heroism
(c) Peace
(d) Tolerance

17. By which of the following treaties was the United Kingdom of Great Britain formed?
(a) Treaty of Versailles
(b) Act of Union
(c) Treaty of Paris
(d) Treaty of Vienna

18. Who was Wolfe Tone?
(a) A French revolutionary.
(b) An Irish Catholic who revolted against British dominance.
(c) A German rebel who revolted against Kaiser William IV
(d) A British protestant leader.

19. Which of the following best explain Utopian society?
(a) A society where everybody is equal.
(b) A democratic society.
(c) An idealist society that can never be achieved.
(d) A society with a comprehensive Constitution.

20 After the French Revolution (1789) the right to vote was given to
(a) all adult population of the country.
(b) all property-owning male citizens of the country.
(c) all property-owning males and women of the country.
(d) all adults excluding women of the country.

21. The main function of the Prussian Zollverein was to
(a) impose a custom duty on imported goods.
(b) abolish the tariff barrier.
(c) reduce custom duties.
(d) impose new rules for trade.

22. Which of the following group of powers collectively defeated Napoleon?
(a) England, France, Italy, Russia.
(b) England, Austria, Spain, Russia.
(c) Austria, Prussia, Russia, Britain.
(d) Britain, Prussia, Russia, Italy.

23. Which of the following countries is considered as the ‘cradle of civilization’?
(a) England
(b) France
(c) Greece
(d) Russia

24. The Treaty of Vienna signed in 1815
(a) brought the conservative regimes back to power.
(b) destroyed the conservative powers of Europe.
(c) introduced democracy in Austria and Prussia.
(d) set up a new Parliament in Austria.

25. Romanticism refers to a
(a) cultural movement
(b) religious movement
(c) political movement
(d) literary movement

26. In Prussia, who was referred to as ‘Junkers’?
(a) Military officials
(b) Large landowners
(c) Factory owners
(d) Aristocratic nobles

27. Which of the following is an allegory/attribute for ‘liberty’?
(a) Crown of Oak
(b) Red Cap
(c) Olive Branch
(d) Sword

28. What does a blindfolded woman carrying a pair of weighing scales symbolise?
(a) Peace
(b) Equality
(c) Justice
(d) Liberty

29. Who among the following was proclaimed the first King of United Italy?
(a) Nicholas II
(b) King George II
(c) Wilhelm IV
(d) Victor Emannuel II

30 A nation-state is a state where
(a) people of all groups enjoy equal rights.
(b) where the nation has its own emblem and flag.
(c) a state which has a contiguous territory.
(d) a state where people live in a common territory, develop a sense of identity and share a common history.

31. Most important outcome of the French Revolution of 1789 was
(a) the abolition of absolute monarchy.
(b) making of a new Constitution.
(c) transfer of sovereignty from the monarch to the French citizens.
(d) Formation of the National Assembly.

32. Identify and mark the incorrect response. The Napoleonic Code
(a) did away with all the privileges based on ‘birth and established equality.
(b) destroyed feudalism in France.
(c) formulated codes for the army.
(d) ensured right to property for the privileged class.

33. A large number of people were hostile to the Napoleonic code because
(a) it was not suitable for all.
(b) it destroyed the special privileges of the rulers.
(c) administrative changes did not go hand-in-hand with political freedom.
(d) none of the above.

34. For the middle class of Europe, the most important feature of Liberalism was
(a) abolition of conservatism.
(b) right to be liberal and educated.
(c) individual freedom and equality before law.
(d) representative government.

35. Why did the Frankfurt Parliament fail to achieve its goal?
(a) Women were excluded from the membership.
(b) Did not have the support of the peasants.
(c) Kaiser William refused to accept the crown and opposed the assembly.
(d) None of the above.

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Chapter 7 -The Necklace

NCERT Solutions for Class 10 English Chapter 7 -
The Necklace

Ques: What kind of a person is Mme Loisel and why is she always unhappy?

Answer: Mme Loisel is a young, pretty, ordinary but discontented woman. She is of humble background but dreams of riches and comforts. She is proud of her beauty and wants to be admired. Her meager resources are not enough to satisfy her expensive cravings making her angry all the time.

The Necklace Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 7



The Necklace Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 7
CBSE Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet Chapter 7 Summary

Matilda was a pretty lady, born in a poor family. She was married to a clerk. She suffered a lot of misery as she felt that she had been born for better things. All day, she would daydreaming of luxurious houses, dainty dinners, elegant dresses and beautiful jewellery.
One day, her husband came home very happy. He had an invitation to dinner for both of them from the Minister of Public Instruction. He thought his wife would be happy, but she only got angry and threw the invitation card on the table. On being asked why she reacted in such a manner, she replied that she did not have a proper gown or jewellery, fit for the party. Her loving husband gave her all the money he had set aside to buy a gun.
When the dress was ready, Matilda’s husband saw that still she was not happy. On being asked the reason, she said that she had no jewels. Exasperated, her husband asked her to wear fresh flower. When she refused to do so, in desperation he told her to borrow’ jewellery from her dear friend — Mrs. Forestier. Matilda borrowed a diamond necklace from her. She was a great hit at the party. Everyone admired her. She danced till 4 a.m. in the morning and then went home, tired but happy.
On reaching home, she decided to take a final look at herself. She was shocked when she found the necklace was missing. They looked everywhere for it, but it was nowhere to be found. They went to the police and also put an advertisement in the papers. In the meantime they wnote to Madame Forestier that the clasp was broken and also that they would get the necklace repaired and return it.
When the necklace was not found, they decided to replace it with a similar necklace. They bought it for forty thousand Francs, and had to take a loan for it.
In order to repay the loan, they took a rented room and turned away the maid. All the household work was done by Matilda. Mr. Loisel took up overtime work to save money. This life continued for almost ten years, by the end of which Mrs. Loisel looked old and scruffy.
One day she happened to meet Mrs. Forestier who still looked young. Matilda told her the whole story. Shocked at the story, Mrs. Forestier told her a shocking truth, the diamond necklace that she had lent to Matilda had been made of artificial diamonds and was worth only five hundred francs.


 
Extract Based Questions (4 marks each)

Question 1.
Instead of being delighted, as her husband had hoped, she threw the invitation spitefully upon the table murmuring, “What do you suppose I want with that ?”
(a) Why did her husband hope that she would become happy ?
(b) What was her reaction ?
(c) What does murmuring means ?
(d) Why did Matilda throw the invitation ? (1×4=4)
Answer:
(a) He hoped that his wife would be happy on seeing the invitation to party from Minister of Public Instructions.
(b) She got angry and threw the invitation card on table.
(c) ‘speaking in a low and unclear manner’.
(d) Because she wanted an attire according to the occassion.

Question 2.
The day of the ball approached and Matilda Loisel seemed sad, disturbed, anxious. Nevertheless, her dress was nearly ready.
(a) Why was Matilda Loisel sad and disturbed ?
(b) Why did she get a dress ready ?
(c) What is a ‘ball’ ?
(d) Which word means the same as ‘coming’ ? (1×4=4)
Answer:
(a) She was sad and disturbed because she had no jewels.
(b) She got a dress ready to put on the occasion of a ‘ball’ party, orginised by Minister of Public Instruction.
(c) A dance party.
(d) Approached.

Question 3.
Read the lines given below and answer the questions that follow:
“I returned another to you exactly like it. And it has taken us ten years to pay for it. You can understand that it was not easy for us who have nothing.”
(a) Who is’I’?
(b) Why did it take the ten years to pay for ‘it’ ?
(c) Write the antonym of ‘nothing’.
(d) Which word in the passage means the same as ‘similiar’ ? (1×4=4)
Answer:
Value Points:
(a) Matilda Loisel.
(b) Had no moneym had to work hard to collect money to pay for the necklace. 
(c) Everything.
(d) Exactly.
Detailed Answer:
(a) T is Matilda Loisel.
(b) It look then then years to return the money, collected to pay (as debt) for the lost necklace.
(c) Antonym of ‘nothing’ is ‘everything.’
(d) Exactly means the same as ‘similar’.

Short Answer Type Questions (30-40 words & 2 marks each)

Question 1.
Why was Matilda always unhappy ? 
Answer:
Matilda was always unhappy because she had been born into a simple family of clerks and married also to a clerk. Thus, her desires to be rich or distinguished or of becoming known were never fulfilled which caused her to be unhappy.

Question 2.
Why was Matilda Loisel always unhappy ?

Answer:
Value Points:
Matilda Loisel was very pretty considered herself born for a luxurious life.
But in reality she was married petty clerk.
The poverty of her apartment and the lack of fashionable clothes and jewellery too added to her unhappiness. (Any two) 
Detailed Answer:
Matilda Loisel was very pretty. She considered herself being born for a luxurious life but the reality differed from her dreams. In reality she was married to a petty clerk and led a very simple life. Her fantasy over ambitiousness made her unhappy.

Question 3.
Why did Mathilda not want to see her rich friends ? 
Answer:
Value Points:
Her friends were rich and full of money power but she was married to a simle clerk, had inferiority complex. 

Detailed Answer:
Mathilda did not want to see her rich friends because she suffered from inferiority complex. She was married to a simple clerk; whereas her friends were rich and full of money power.

Question 4.
What was Loisel’s reaction to his wife’s desire for a new dress ? 
Answer:
The Loisel’s had been invited to a party at the minister’s residence. When Matilda told her husband that she wanted a new dress to wear, first of all he asked her to wear whatever she possessed. When she got angry and refused to go to the party at all, he finally agreed to let her buy a new one.


 

Question 5.
Do you think M. Loisel had an enjoyable evening at the ball ? Give reasons for your answer. 

Answer:
I think M. Loisel didn’t enjoy much at the ball. In fact, he was not much interested in such parties. He had come there for the sake of his wife’s happiness. So when his wife was dancing with enthusiasm, intoxicated with pleasure, he waited for her (but without disturbing her) half asleep in one of the little salons since midnight.

Question 6.
How did the Loisel react when they realised that the necklace had been lost ? 
Answer:
As soon as they realised that the necklace had been lost their short-lived happiness degenerated into shock of the worst nightmare. Matilda uttered a cry. Loisel, already half undressed, arose in dismay and went immediately on foot in search of necklace.

Question 7.
Why was Matilda sad after the ball? 
Answer:
The night of the ball had been the realisation of a long cherished dream for Matilda, when she was the focus of all the attention and every eye admired her. But the happiness was short-lived and degenerated into shock of the worst nightmare when she discovered that the necklace was missing from her attire. Her mind was ridden with forebodings of how she would face Madame Forestier and pay up for the loss.

Question 8.
What was the cause of Matilda’s ruin ?
Answer:
Her own discontentment was the cause of her ruin. She always felt that she had been born for better things. So her desires to be rich or distinguished or of becoming known were never fulfilled which caused her to be unhappy and ruined.

Question 9.
What changes came into the life of the Loisel after borrowing money ? 
Answer:
After borrowing money, a lot of changes came in the life of the Loisel. They had to do away with the maid and Matilda had to do all the household chores. She had to carry down the refuse to the street and carry water upstairs. She had to do all the shopping from the market after a lot of haggling. Her husband also had to work hard. He worked in the evenings and sometimes even at night. Thus, their life changed drastically.

Question 10.
Why could Mrs. Forestier not recognize her friend Matilda at the end of the story ? 
Answer:
Matilda had to work very hard to lead her life. She had become a strong, hard woman, the crude woman of the household. In fact she had started looking old. One Sunday evening, when she was taking a walk in the Champs Elysees, she met Mrs. Forestier who still looked young and pretty. As Matilda had started looking old and haggard, she could’t be recognized by her.

Long Answer Type Questions (100-120 words & 8 marks each)

Question 1.
Why did Matilda’s husband go out into the cold night, minutes after returning from the ball ? Was he successful in his purpose ?
Answer:
On returning from the ball, Matilda noticed that the necklace, which she had borrowed from Madame Forestier, was missing. They searched for the necklace everywhere. Matilda’s husband went out into the cold night searching for the lost necklace. He went on foot over the route, filed police complaint, enquired cab offices and even put an advertisement in newspapers, offering a reward. But then, all his efforts went in vain. He was not able to find the lost necklace.

Question 2.
What did Loisel do to replace the necklace ?
Answer:
Loisel had to pay thirty six thousand Francs for the new necklace. To replace the lost necklace, Loisel used eighteen thousand francs which were set aside by Mr. Loisel’s father. The remaining1-amount was borrowed from moneylenders. In order to repay the borrowed money they went without maid and Matilda did all the household chores whereas Mr. Loisel even worked overtime. In this way, they led a miserable life just to collect enough amount to replace the lost necklace.

Question 3.
What was the cause of Matilda’s ruin ? How could she have avoided it ?
OR
What could have happened to Matilda if she had confessed to her friend that she had lost her necklace ?
Answer:
Value Points:
Matilda was a pretty, young lady who was always unhappy with her life. For the party she had borrowed a necklace. She lost the necklace of Mrs. Forestier. Losing of the necklace was the cause of her ruin. It forced them to spend thtir saved amount as well as to borrow eighteen thousand francs. She could have easily avoided her ruin if she had confessed the truth to Mrs. Forestier.
Detailed Answer:
Matilda had borrowed a necklace from her friend Madame Forestier to wear in the party. It was a beautiful one and Matilda, a pretty woman, became the centre of attraction at the party. All this happiness was short-lived because on reaching home, she discovered that she had lost it. All her efforts to find it were in vain. She and her husband borrowed huge sums of money to replace the necklace and henceforth faced a miserable life. On the other hand, if she had confessed to her friend that she had lost the necklace and had apologized she might have saved her family from a lot of miseries as the necklace was not even worth 500 francs in reality.

Question 4.
Why did Matilda change her lifestyle after the ball ?
OR
What changes came into the life of the Loisel after the incident of borrowing the necklace ?
Answer:
Value Points :
The Loisels had sent away their maid. They changed their lodgings and rented some rooms in an attic. Mme. Loisel did all the cooking, rubbing and cleaning work herself. She brought water and haggled at shops. Mr. Loisel worked evenings and nights. They suffered for ten years.

Detailed Answer:

Matilda had been enjoying thoroughly at the ball and in the pleasure of the moment, she got careless and lost the necklace. All search was in vain and the expensive jewel (or so they thought) had to be replaced. The debt incurred was much beyond their capacity to pay and thus they had to make severe compromises in their lifestyle, foregoing every luxury. Matilda worked laboriously at the household chores while M. Loisel overworked at the office. Thus, they slogged for ten long years to pay up the loan.

Question 5.
How had Mme Loisel’s sacrifice all been in vain ?
Answer:
The pleasure of looking pretty at the ball proved an expensive bargain for Matilda, as she lost the necklace borrowed from Mme Forestier. It took Loisel’s ten long years to pay back the huge sum they borrowed to replace the lost necklace.
Years later, when Matilda saw Mme Forestier, she disclosed the truth of the lost necklace. She was dumb-founded to discover that it was not a genuine piece of jewellery and had been worth just five hundred francs. All her sacrifices and comprises had been meaningless.

Question 6.
What is your opinion about M. Loisel as a husband ?
Answer:
M. Loisel was a loving husband beyond any doubt. He was aware of his wife’s aspirations and so he thought that the invitation to the ball would please her and expressed no offence when she reacted negatively. Instead, he offered his savings to buy her an outfit, suited for the occasion.
Even when Matilda lost the necklace, he cooperated at every step to make up for the loss and made the neccessary compromises in his life without complaining.

Question 7.
How can you say that Mr. Loisel was a simple man and loved his wife very much ?
Answer:
Value Points:
Petty clerk, no showy nature, simple living
loved his wife’s simple dress
satisfied, praised her beauty
fulfilled her desire, purchased new dress
not aggressive at the loss of necklace
worked evening and night-paid the amount
Detailed Answer:
He was a petty clerk in the office of the Board of Education. He was neither rich nor distinguished. He didn’t have showy nature. He loved simple living, i.e,, he loved simple home food, served in ordinary utensils; lived in a simple house with shabby walls and worn chairs. But he didn’t have any complaint.
He loved his wife very much and praised her beauty. She was fond of grandeur in life. So he managed to bring her an invitation to attend the minister’s party. For that party, he offered her 400 Francs to buy a new dress which he had saved to buy a new gun for himself. When she had lost the necklace at the party, without being aggressive he arranged 36000 Franks for replacing the same. Moreover, he worked evening and night, after his regular job to repay the amount.


Question 1.
‘The Necklace’ reveals that vanity is an evil. It may bring joy for a short period but ultimately it leads to ruin. If you were placed in a situation similar to that of Matilda, what would have you done ? Write your views. [Value Based Question]
Answer:
‘The necklace’, through the example of Matilda conveys a chore truth that one must value what he has and cherish. His blessings rather than chase illussions in the form of material possessions, because if one lacks contentment then there is no end to the chase.
Matilda should have valued the love of her husband rather than grumble about her unfulfilled aspirations. And to look beautiful, one does not need to borrow expensive jewels; it is the goodness of a person and the way one conducts, makes one beautiful.

Question 2.
‘Contentment is a great wealth.’ Explain with reference to Matilda—the main character of this story. 

Answer:
There is no doubt in saying that man’s final goal should be contentment. Human beings can never be happy if they have unlimited desires and wants. This is shown by the character Matilda who was never happy with what she had but always desired for more and more which led her to ruin. Man should find happiness in what he has, rather than running after what he does not have. It could be the cause of his unhappiness and sorrow. 

Featured Post

All the Prime Ministers of India with Information

All the Prime Ministers of India with  Information   The Prime Ministers of India with some basic information about them: 1.         Jawah...